My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2002_0603
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2002
>
CC_Minutes_2002_0603
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:39:51 AM
Creation date
8/14/2006 12:59:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/3/2002
Meeting Type
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />To: City Council and Manager <br /> <br />From: Joel Jamnik <br /> <br />Subject: Phosphorus Fertilizer Regulations <br /> <br />Backaround <br /> <br />Cities and environmental groups successfully supported legislation this past <br />session that restricts the use of phosphorus fertilizer. The Minnesota Lakes <br />Association states that, "According to industry experts, 700/0 of Minnesota soils <br />do not need phosphorus to produce turf. Phosphorus run-off into lakes, streams, <br />wetlands, and water holding ponds increases the amount of algae in a body of <br />water. One pound of phosphorus will grow 300-500 pounds of algae bloom. A <br />number of cities in Minnesota have already passed local ordinances to restrict <br />the application of phosphorus on residential turf. A number of other cities are <br />considering similar ordinances. A statewide law would provide for uniform, <br />consistent application of the law and provide the market that fertilizer producers <br />say they need to economically make available phosphorus-free fertilizer." <br /> <br />As indicated by the Lakes Association, several cities in Minnesota, including <br />Roseville, have ordinances restricting the application of phosphorus fertilizer <br />within city limits. A smaller group of cities have taken the additional step of <br />regulating the sale of fertilizer containing phosphorus. <br /> <br />What the New Law Provides <br /> <br />Chapter 345, as passed and signed into law, provides that effective immediatelv, <br />a local unit of government may not adopt any ordinance, regulate, or in any way <br />restrict the distribution, sale, handling, use, or application of phosphorous <br />fertilizers and phosphorous fertilizer products that are applied or will be applied to <br />land used for qrowinq crops or anv other aqricultural use. <br /> <br />The law also provides that effective January 1, 2004 a local unit of government <br />may not adopt any ordinance that prohibits or regulates the registration, labeling, <br />distribution, sale, handling, use, application, or disposal of turf fertilizer containing <br />phosphorus, however, this provision will not prohibit or preempt a local ordinance <br />that restricts the sale of turf phosphorous fertilizer that was in effect on August 1, <br />2002. The new law also specifically states that it does not preempt local <br />authority or responsibility for zoning, fire codes, or hazardous waste disposal. <br /> <br />Effective in January I, 2004 a person may not apply a fertilizer containing the <br />plant nutrient phosphorus to turf in a metropolitan county, except when: (1) a <br />tissue, soil, or other test by a laboratory or method approved by the <br />commissioner and performed within the last three years indicates that the levels <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.