My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2006_0814
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2006
>
CC_Minutes_2006_0814
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:40:21 AM
Creation date
9/6/2006 4:21:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
8/14/2006
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 08/14/06 <br />Minutes - Page 23 <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding use of the ALG; hourly rates; <br />qualifications and expertise of arbitrators; and the process. <br /> <br />Kough moved, Ihlan seconded, authorizing the City Attorney to <br />select an independent hearing officer, selected from the Office of <br />Administrative Hearings (OAH) personnel, to consider alcohol <br />compliance penalties imposed on the Green Mill and Old <br />Chicago restaurants. <br /> <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Ihlan; Pust; Kough; and Klausing. <br />Nays: Maschka. <br /> <br />11. <br /> <br />Councilmember-Initiated Items from July 24, 2006 Council <br />Meeting - or past meetings <br /> <br />l1.a <br /> <br />Request of Councilmember Ihlan: City practices and <br />policy for forwarding e-mails to third parties; and <br />who determines the relevance of when information is <br />included in a Council packet <br />Interim City Manager Miller reviewed City Attorney- <br />recommended language to accompany the e-mail <br />hyperlink located on the City's website, linking to City <br />Councilmember's e-mail boxes. <br /> <br />Discussion included determination of who on City staff <br />were included as recipients of e-mails addressed to the <br />Council as a whole; Councilmember Ihlan's interpretation <br />of State Statute 13.601 language related to elected <br />officials and staff; ability of senders to address their <br />concerns privately to individual Councilmembers; and <br />City Attorney interpretation and legal advice to the City <br />Council related to proposed language and recipient <br />identity. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan disputed City Attorney Anderson's <br />interpretation of State Statute; and opined that "we'll be <br />government by City Attorney." <br /> <br />Councilmember Pust opined she would rely on the advice <br /> <br />Councilmember- <br />Initiated Items <br />from past meetings <br /> <br />Forwarding <br />e-mails to third <br />parties; and <br />information <br />included in a <br />Council packet <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.