My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2006_0814
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2006
>
CC_Minutes_2006_0814
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:40:21 AM
Creation date
9/6/2006 4:21:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
8/14/2006
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 08/14/06 <br />Minutes - Page 24 <br /> <br />of the City Attorney as to the intended meaning of <br />"recipient" and not attempt to substitute her personal <br />interpretati on. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing encouraged an open and transparent <br />policy for receipt of general e-mails for the Council as a <br />whole. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pust stated, for the record, that she was <br />elected to make policy decisions, not to provide her <br />personal legal advice to the City, and instances where she <br />sought legal advice on specific policies from the City <br />Attorney, she would rely on that advice. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing asked Councilmember Ihlan if she would <br />use the same rationale if the disputed e-mail had been <br />from a developer, and should have seen the light of day in <br />order to provide public information. Mayor Klausing <br />reviewed the procedure for the public to contact <br />individual Councilmembers bye-mail or phone in a more <br />private manner, rather than e-mailing to the City Council <br />as a whole. <br /> <br />City Attorney Anderson clarified that, when recipient <br />identified the City Council as a whole, or a majority <br />thereof, that the recipient had decided as a matter of <br />policy that an e-mail may be passed on, and would not be <br />in any violation of law by doing so. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan reiterated her concerns; opmmg <br />that is was up to the City Council to forward e-mails, not <br />the City staff; and based on that statement, she would be <br />voting against the proposed motion. <br /> <br />Klausing moved, Pust seconded, approval of revised <br />language that would accompany e-mail hyperlinks located <br />on the City's website, linking to City Councilmember <br />e-mail boxes as follows: <br /> <br />"If you want to e-mail the Mayor and all Council members at once, send e- <br />mail to citV.council@ci.roseville.mn.us. E-mail sent to that address is <br />automatically forwarded to the Mayor, all Councilmembers, and certain <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.