Laserfiche WebLink
4.0B <br />ACKGROUND <br />11 <br />4.1The property located in Planning District 13, has a Comprehensive Plan designation of <br />12 <br />Low-Density Residential (LR) and a zoning classification of Low-Density Residential <br />13 <br />District 1 (LDR-1). <br />14 <br />4.2A application has been submitted in lieu of the preliminary plat/final <br />MINOR SUBDIVISION <br />15 <br />plat process because §1104.04E (Minor Subdivision) of the City Code establishes the <br />16 <br />three-parcel minor subdivision process to simplify those subdivisions “which create a <br />17 <br />total of three or fewer parcels, situated in accordance with City codes, and no further <br />18 <br />utility or street extensions are necessary, and the new parcels meet or exceed the size <br />19 <br />requirements of the zoning code.” The current application meets all of these criteria. <br />20 <br />5.0RPMS <br />EVIEW OF ROPOSEDINORUBDIVISION <br />21 <br />5.1City Code §1103.06F (Lot Standards) requires that the lines forming the sides of new <br />22 <br />parcels to be perpendicular or radial to the front street right-of-way. The North Gluek <br />23 <br />Lane right-of-way is neither straight nor regularly curved, however, and most other side <br />24 <br />lot lines in the area are several degrees off of perpendicular or radial to the front street <br />25 <br />right-of-way. The proposed southern boundary of the new Parcel B (shown in the survey <br />26 <br />included with this staff report as Attachment C) is parallel with the southernmost parcel <br />27 <br />boundary. While the alignment of the new parcel boundary would be within the same <br />28 <br />angular range of nearby lot lines, it would not be exactly radial with the front street right- <br />29 <br />of-way; if that particular code requirement is intended to facilitate regular, predictably- <br />30 <br />shaped parcels, Planning Division staff believes that the proposal conforms to this intent <br />31 <br />by creating a mostly-rectangular Parcel A without creating an over complex Parcel B. <br />32 <br />5.2City Code §1004.08 (LDR-1 District Standards) requires corner single-family parcels to <br />33 <br />be at least 100 feet wide and 100 feet deep, and to comprise at least 12,500 square feet in <br />34 <br />total area. The proposed corner parcel (i.e., Parcel A) would measure 159 feet in width <br />35 <br />and an average of about 129 feet in depth, and it would have 20,470 square feet of area. <br />36 <br />The existing improvements would remain on this parcel, and the house would stand about <br />37 <br />50 feet from the proposed shared parcel boundary. To avoid creating a nonconforming <br />38 <br />shed setback as a result of approving the , Planning Division staff <br />MINOR SUBDIVISION <br />39 <br />recommends removing or relocating the shed to stay at least 5 feet south of the new <br />40 <br />parcel boundary, or shifting the proposed new parcel boundary another few feet farther <br />41 <br />north. <br />42 <br />5.3City Code §1004.08 (LDR-1 District Standards) requires interior (i.e., non-corner) single- <br />43 <br />family parcels to be at least 85 feet wide and 110 feet deep, and to comprise at least <br />44 <br />11,000 square feet in total area. The proposed northern parcel (i.e., Parcel B) would <br />45 <br />measure about 100 feet in width at its narrowest and an average about 142 feet in depth, <br />46 <br />and it would have about 16,442 square feet of area. <br />47 <br />5.4In reviewing the application, Roseville’s Development Review Committee (DRC) has <br />48 <br />confirmed that adequate sewer and water utilities are present in the North Gluek Lane <br />49 <br />right-of-way to serve the proposed parcel. The DRC also noted that a broader 50-foot <br />50 <br />easement buffering the pond will be needed in addition to the standard 5-foot and 10-foot <br />51 <br />PF12-004_RCA_051412 (2) <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br />