My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2002_0715
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2002
>
CC_Minutes_2002_0715
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:41:21 AM
Creation date
10/31/2006 9:28:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/15/2002
Meeting Type
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />would be no street assessment; that is what the current <br />assessment policy says. But... <br /> <br />i. ... Single family owners were told about the streetscape <br />assessment because the single family owners asked for <br />the enhanced streetscape. Should we go ahead and <br />assess them for the streetscape they asked for? <br />H. ...Advent Lutheran Church was told it may have a <br />1000/0 assessment under the current street assessment <br />policy. (Advent Lutheran was also told that <br />historically the Council has reduced such assessments <br />at the assessment hearing.) In light of this, should <br />your proposed assessment policy at 25% be used with <br />respect to Advent's assessment? They did know there <br />would be an assessment. <br /> <br />4. Net Effect. Our preliminary judgment of the impact of the <br />Josephine, Owasso situation is that some significant street <br />costs will not be reimbursed to the City under your proposal. If <br />that is the case, then the City may have to move back the next <br />set of MSA street reconstructions in order to let the MSA fund <br />grow to make up for these non-reimbursed costs. Is that okay? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.