Laserfiche WebLink
<br />September 30, 2002 <br /> <br />To: City Council <br /> <br />From: Joel Janmik <br /> <br />Subject: Relief Association Eligibility for Professional Fire Personnel <br /> <br />Issue <br /> <br />Are professional (full-time) firefighters eligible for membership in the Relief Association? <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />Milmesota still has the majority of its fire protection services provided by volunteers. While most <br />deparh11ents provide only nominal consideration for the services of these individuals, state law authorizes <br />the creation of nonprofit relief associations that provide a pension benefit for volunteer firefighters. <br /> <br />Firefighters who are not volunteers (often referred to as "professional", "paid", "salaried", "full-time" or <br />various combinations thereof) are eligible for membership in the Public Employee's Retirement Association <br />(PERA). <br /> <br />Given the evolution of some fire deparh11ents to "combined" departments comprised of both volunteers and <br />paid firefighters, a legal question has been raised regarding the eligibility of paid firefighters to become <br />members in relief associations. <br /> <br />The Office of State Auditor (OSA) and PERA generally have taken the position that dual membership in <br />two pension plans constitutes double credit for the same service in conh'avention of state law. <br /> <br />However, while the PERA laws generally prevent using volunteer compensation and benefits as part of the <br />formula for calculating state PERA pension benefits, no parallel prohibition exists for most relief <br />associations. Consequently, some paid or salaried firefighters have joined, or sought to join, local relief <br />associations. The firefighters within the Edina Fire Department are members of both PERA and a local <br />relief association. In addition, the City of Hastings was involved in litigation regarding salaried firefighters <br />who sought service credit in the local relief association. While the court concluded that in these situations <br />dual pension benefits present an opportunity for "double dipping", it left resolution of this potential <br />problem to the legislature and to local relief associations. As of this date the legislature has not responded, <br />leaving the matter primarily in the hands oflocal relief association officials. Further complicating matters <br />is that the Hastings case was not appealed, and so is not binding precedent. <br /> <br />Relief Associations face a tough task evaluating the problem and their unique local situations. <br />Different questions and policies are raised if the full-time firefighter is hourly rate or salaried, since <br />overtime compensation can affect PERA earnings reports. Questions of fairness and equity are raised when <br />the Department has salaried firefighters of its own and volunteers who also serve as paid firefighters in <br />other communities. Call-back, emergency response, and overtime policies of departments affect the <br />analysis, as does the eligibility and service credit formulas of the relief associations. <br /> <br />The OSA and PERA positions remain opposed to dual eligibility, and local relief association officials must <br />consider potential state action (such as withholding state pension aid) in fashioning a response. There is <br />also the possibility of additional lawsuits depending on what actions they take, or if they fail to act. <br /> <br />At this time, there is no safe harbor. <br />