Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Regular City Council Minutes 12/02/02 <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />Relief Association to seek a judge's opinion, through <br />Probate Court, on whether the Association's by-laws need <br />to be amended to provide PERA retirement funds for full- <br />time personnel and Fire Relief Association retirement <br />funds to part-time personnel. Mayor Kysylyczyn <br />encouraged the Council to determine what their position <br />was on this issue, prior to receiving notice of a hearing, as <br />a contributor to both funds, which has significant financial <br />impact on the City's budget. Mayor Kysylyczyn <br />recommended that the Council's position be one of <br />opposition to dual pensions. <br /> <br />Discussion included how many current employees were <br />affected with Finance Director Miller estimating 6 7 City <br />employees who also serve as volunteers on the Fire <br />Department; discrimination tests for qualified plans; <br />impacts on current and future recruitment of Fire <br />Department personnel; estimated annual cost to the City, <br />which Mr. Miller estimated at $250,000 in 2002 <br />accommodate for shortfalls in the Fire Relief <br />Association's retirement fund; State Aid and commercial <br />property insurance funds; ERISA requirements; <br /> <br />It was the consensus of Councilmembers that the issue was <br />not a policy issue and should be resolved by the court <br />process, with any amendments to the by-laws by the Fire <br />Relief Association, not the City Council, even though it <br />will have economic interest to the City. <br /> <br />Kysylyczyn moved, Schroeder seconded, that the <br />Roseville City Council takes no opinion at the present time <br />on the issue of dual eligibility for Public Employee <br />Retirement Association (PERA) retirement funds and Fire <br />Relief Association pension funds. <br /> <br />Ayes: <br />Nays: <br /> <br />Roll Call <br />Kough, Schroeder and Kysylyczyn. <br />Klausing and Maschka. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued regarded the unfunded liability <br />of approximately $79,000, and whether staff should <br />