My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1998 Residential Survey
Roseville
>
Studies, Task Forces, Special Committees, Reports
>
Surveys
>
1998 Residential Survey
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 12:33:44 PM
Creation date
5/23/2012 3:29:10 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
481
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DON'T KNQW/REFUSED <br />Only nine percent fc1E it was '`only fair"' on this din�ension. <br />-���0 <br />Higher ratings were posted by college graduates, owners of homes valued at $100,000.00 to <br />$150,000.00, over $50,000.00 annual income households and residcnts who feel the quality of <br />life is excellent. Lower ratings were encountered arnong eighteen to forty-four year oids, non- <br />college graduates, renters, under $50,000.00 annuai income households, Precincts �;ight, Nine <br />and Tcn residents and residcnts who feel the quality of life is good or only fair. <br />Resale value of homes <br />Eighty-seven percent rated the resale value of their home as "excellent" or "good:" <br />EXCELLEN`i` . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />GOOD ................... ..... . <br />�NLY FAIR . . . . . . . . . . . . • <br />POOR .......... ............... <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUST;D . . <br />Four percent were more critical in their judgments. <br />............. �8% <br />. ......... 49% <br />..... ........ J% <br />---... ...... 1% <br />. 9% <br />Ratings were higher among city residents for over twenty years, forty-five to sixty-four year olds, <br />owners of homes valued at under $150,000.00, over $SO,OU0.00 annual income households and <br />Precincts One, Two and Three residents. They were Iower among eighteen to forty-four year <br />olds and Precincts F.ight, Nine and Ten residents. <br />Street maintenance <br />Eighty-seven percent also rated strcet maintenance in their neighborhood as cither "eacellent" or <br />"good:" <br />EXCELLENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20°/a <br />GOOD....................................... 67% <br />ONLY FAIR .............................. . ... ll% <br />POOR................... ........................ 1% <br />DON' i KNOW/REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 °/a <br />Only n�velve �percent rated it as "only fair" or "poor." <br />Favora�le ratings were posted among women and Precincts Four, Five, Six and Seven residents. <br />Unfavorable ratings were encountered amang eighteen to forty-four year olds, men, Precincts <br />C�ne, Two and Three residents and residents who feel the quality of life is good or only fair. <br />Bus service <br />25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.