My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1998 Residential Survey
Roseville
>
Studies, Task Forces, Special Committees, Reports
>
Surveys
>
1998 Residential Survey
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 12:33:44 PM
Creation date
5/23/2012 3:29:10 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
481
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Thirty-cight percent rated bus scrvice as either "e�cellen�" or �'good.'� ��hile thirt��-t��o percent <br />saw it as "only fair" or "poor:" <br />EXCELLENI' . , <br />GOOU ............... <br />ONLY FAIR . . . <br />YOOR .............. <br />DON'1' KNOW/REFUSED <br />.... ......... 7°,�0 <br />... ... �1% <br />.. .......... 18% <br />...... . .... . . 14% <br />.................. 31% <br />Thirty-one percent, though, were unable to rate this aspect of iheir neighborhood. <br />Favorable ratings were encountered most frequently among Precincts One, '['wo and Three <br />residents and residents who feel the quality of life is excellent. Unfavorablc ratings were posted <br />most often by renters, under $50,000.00 annual income households, Precincts Eight, Nine and <br />Ten residents and residents who feel the quality of life is good or only fair. <br />Freedorrr fYnm excessive noise <br />Seventy percent rated their freedom from excessive noise as either "excellent" or '`good:" <br />EXCI�I.LENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19% <br />GOOD .._..... .... ........ .... ..... ...... 51% <br />ONL�' FAIR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22% <br />POOR........... ......... ................_... 7°/4 <br />DON'T KNO W/REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2°/a <br />But, twenry-nine percent rated this aspect of their neight,orhood Iower. <br />Favorable ratings were posted by over sixty-five year olds and residents who feel the quality of <br />life is excellent. Unfavorable ratings were offered most frequently by eighteen to forty-four year <br />olds, renters and residents who feel the quality of iifc is good or only fair. <br />Convenience of shoppzng areas <br />Ninety-six perccnt rated the conveniencc of shapping areas highly: <br />EXCELLENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58% <br />GO�D ........ ............................... 38% <br />ONLY FAIR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2% <br />POOR............................................ Q% <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2% <br />Oniy two percent rated it lower. <br />Favorable ratings were even higher among empty ncsters and over sixty-ftve year olds. <br />26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.