My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1998 Residential Survey
Roseville
>
Studies, Task Forces, Special Committees, Reports
>
Surveys
>
1998 Residential Survey
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 12:33:44 PM
Creation date
5/23/2012 3:29:10 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
481
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A place ta ruise children <br />Ninety-four percent rated their neighborhood "excellent�' or "good�' as a place to raise children: <br />EXCELLLN�I' _ . . . . . . <br />GOOU ..... .......... <br />ONLY FAIR . . . <br />Poou .......... <br />DON'T KNOW/fZEFUSED <br />.. .. .. .... 40% <br />..... . 54% <br />. 4% <br />.. .................. . 1°/a <br />.. ......... .. �% <br />Only five percent rated it as "only fair" or "poor.'' <br />Higher ratings were seen among over $50,000.00 annual income households and resic�ents r�ho <br />feel the quality of life is exceltcnt. Lower ratings were found among city residents for fi�e years <br />or 1ess, non-college graduates, renters, under $SO,OOOA� annual income houscholds and residents <br />who feel the qurlity of life is good ar only fair. <br />Convenience t� your place of worship <br />Eigh*y-Yive percent rated the convenience to their place of worsttip as "excellent" or "good:'" <br />EXCELLENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 % <br />GOOD ,.... ......... ..... . ............. 54% <br />ONLY FAIR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4°/a <br />POOR........................ .. . ......... 2% <br />DON'T KNOW/IZEFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10% <br />Six Qercent rated it as "only fair" o.r "paor." <br />Favorable ratings were posted by city residents for over six years, househalds containing seniors, <br />over sixty-five year olds, women and residents who feel the quality of life is excellent. Unfavor- <br />ahle ratings were given disproportionately by men. <br />Available day care for children <br />Available day care for children was rated highly by thirty-seven percent and more crxtically by <br />nine percent: <br />EXCELLENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7% <br />GOOD................... ....................... 30% <br />ONLY FAIR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8% <br />POOR........ ............ .......... ............ I% <br />Dt�N'T KNOW/REFtJSED . . . . . _ . . . 54% <br />A iarge iifiy-faur percent were unable to provide a rating on this dimension. <br />Higher ratings were offercd by city residents for six to twenty years and foriy-fivc to siaty-four <br />27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.