Laserfiche WebLink
]99S City of Roseville Residential Stu�li' <br />Decision Resources, Ltd. <br />.1`uly, 1998 <br />"I�hirty-one percent of households contained school-aged children or pre-schoolcrs. <br />Twenty-six percent of households contained senior citizens. <br />Seventy-six percent owned their present res2dence. <br />• The median current value of residcntiai property was $127,500.00. <br />Women and men were equally represented in the samplc. <br />Precinct representation varied across the community. <br />• Thirty-six percent resided in Precincts One through Tliree. <br />• Thirty-four percent lived in Precincts I=our through Sevcn. <br />e Thirty-one percent dweLed in Precincts Eight through Ten. <br />Perspectives oh the Caty of Roseville: <br />Ninety-eight percent rated the quality of life in the community as "excellent" or "good." <br />• �nly two percent rated it as "only fair" or "paor." <br />• "Excellent" ratings soared — from forty-nine percent in the 1990 study — to sixty <br />percent in thc 1998 study. <br />� Needed improvements included "slower development," suggested by eight percent, <br />"better bus service," posted by five perccnt, "lower taxes," at four percent, and "more <br />parks," also cited by four percent. <br />In assessing "high quality" attributes of the community, twenty-s'rx percent pointed to the "park <br />and recreation system." <br />• Eighteen percent cited the "school system." <br />• 5ixteen percent talked about "city services." <br />• "Shopping opportunities" was the choice of twelve percent. <br />• Eleven percent mcntioned "nice ncighborhoods." <br />• Ten percent placed a high value on the "city's tocation." <br />In discussing "low quaiity" aspects of the city, thirty-two percent reported there �vere "none." <br />• "Traffic congestion" troubled thirteen percent. <br />• "Over-development" was mentioned by twelve percent. <br />• "Crime rate" was key to eight percent. <br />• Scven gercent cited "City government." <br />Page 2 <br />