Laserfiche WebLink
�XCEI�LENT <br />GOOD . . _ . . . . . <br />ONI.Y FAIR . . . . . . . . . <br />POOR ....... . . <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED . <br />. . .... ... �4% <br />............ 38% <br />........... ... 8°/� <br />... . 4% <br />............... 47% <br />However, a targc forty-seven percent ��•ere unable to provide a judgment of this city service. <br />Navorable ratings were given by owncrs of homes valued at $100,000.00 to $1 �0,000.00 and <br />men, while unfavorable ratings were posted by city residents for six to twenty years and eighteen <br />to forty-four year olds. <br />Cleaning up trash in the neighborho�d <br />Seventy-three percent rated the cleaning up of trash in the neighborhood as "excellenf' or <br />"good:" <br />EXCEI,L�NT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />GOOD ....................... ... <br />ONLY FAIR . . . . . . . . . . <br />POOR .......... ............ ..... <br />DON'"I` KNOW/REFUS�D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />Thirteen percent rated it as"oniy fair" or "poor." <br />. ... 19% <br />._... 54% <br />. . . 11% <br />..._..... 2% <br />.. 14% <br />I-Iigher ratings were posted by households containing ser�iors, owners of homcs valued at <br />$100,000.00 to $ i 50,000.oa, Precincts Four, Five, Six and Seven residents and residenis who <br />feel the qualiry of life is excellent. Lower ratings were encountered amang over $50,000,�0 <br />annual incomc househalds and Precincts One, Two and 1"hree residents. <br />Res�onsiveness of City government <br />Fifty-three percent rated the responsiveness of City government as "excellent" or "good:" <br />EXCELLENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8% <br />GOOD................. ....... .... .......... 45% <br />ONLY FAIR ............... ...... .... ........ 20% <br />POOR..... ......................... ......... . 5% <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22% <br />Twenty-five percent rated it more critically, while twenty-two gercent were unsure. <br />Higher ratings were posted by city residents for over twenty years, households containing seniors, <br />over sixty-five year olds, owners of homes valued at $100,000.00 to $150,000.�0 and residents <br />who feel the quality of life is cxcellent. Lower ratings were stated by forty-five to sixly-four year <br />o1ds, owners of homes valued at over $150,000.00, over $50,000.00 atu�ual income households <br />37 <br />