Laserfiche WebLink
residents. <br />City Tax Policies <br />Kesidents were told: <br />Currently, the Ciry:s share nf the J�ropertv ta.0 does' <br />not increase higher than the rate of inflation euch <br />year. A one percent increase ubove inflatton wnuld <br />cast un owner of �the rypical SI00, 000 home about ZO <br />cents per month in additional J�roperty tuxes, and <br />wnuld produce an additional5'63, (J00 in general <br />revenue. <br />They were then asked: <br />If an addztional revenue increase were needed beyond <br />the rate of inflation to expand or im�rove hasic city <br />services, how much wnuld you be willing to .see your <br />property taxes increase per month for this purpose? <br />The typical Koseville residcnt was willing to support a monthly tax increase of $2.55 beyond the <br />rate of inflation: <br />NOTHING .. ... .... .......... .._............ lb% <br />$1.0� ._....... . . ........... ................. S% <br />$2.00 .................. ..... .... .... I9% <br />$3.00 .................... ....... ............... 10% <br />$4.00 ... ..... ..... .........,.. .. 6% <br />$5.00 .......................... ........... .. 16% <br />$6.00 .............. . ............... 5% <br />$7.00 ........ ............... ................. 6% <br />DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14% <br />REFUSED......... ................. ............... 1% <br />T1qis level of additional ta�tes would gencrate totai revenues of approximately $790,000 annually. <br />"Nothing" was offered by city residents for over twenty years, households containing seniors, <br />over sixty-five year olds and Precincts One, Two and Three residents. "$1.00" was mentioned by <br />non-college graduates, while "$2.00" was cited by eighteen to Torty-four year olds, renters, under <br />$50,000 annual income households and Precincts Four, Five, Six and 5even residents. "$3.00" <br />was reported by non-college graduates, while "$4.00" was seleeted by city residenis for five years <br />or less and men. "$5,00" was suggested by forty-five to sixty-four year olds and over $50,000.0{) <br />annual income r�ouseholds. "$6.00" was stated by househoids conEaining children, owners of <br />homes valued at $100,000.00 to $150,000.00, over $50,OOO.QO annual income households and <br />residents who feel the quality of life is excellent. "$7.00" was reported by households contairaing <br />children and college graduates. <br />47 <br />