My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2006_1031
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2006
>
CC_Minutes_2006_1031
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:42:55 AM
Creation date
11/21/2006 9:43:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/23/2006
Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Special City Council Meeting -10/31/06 <br />Minutes - Page 10 <br /> <br />support for testing all six candidates around their interview <br />schedules; and staff was so directed. <br /> <br />Ms. Bacon was further directed to choose the most applicable firm <br />to provide the testing. <br /> <br />Ms. Bacon referenced the City Attorney's opinion regarding the <br />public nature of the individual Councilmember interviews with <br />candidates; and sought direction on scheduling 1/2 hour <br />interviews accordingly. <br /> <br />Council consensus supported Ms. Bacon's assumptions for <br />scheduling one-on-one interviews, open to the public, with <br />individual candidates. <br /> <br />Ms. Bacon reviewed the proposed schedule and format for the <br />public social with City Manager candidates (Exhibit C), scheduled <br />for 5:00 -7:00 p.m. on Thursday, November 16. <br /> <br />Council consensus was in agreement with the suggested schedule; <br />and Ms. Bacon was directed to proceed as outlined. <br /> <br />Ms. Bacon reviewed the proposed candidate schedule (Exhibit D), <br />noting that she would need to incorporate an additional candidate <br />to the schedule, as she had only anticipated five candidates. <br /> <br />Council consensus concurred with the proposed candidate <br />schedule, as amended to include six candidates, as proposed by <br />Ms. Bacon, and she was directed to proceed. <br /> <br />Ms. Bacon was directed to select a location for the Candidate and <br />Council dinner; with Ms. Pust opining her support for a location <br />within the City of Roseville. <br /> <br />A brief discussion was held on contract negotiation process and <br />determinations in closed Executive Session; City Attorney <br />participation in the offer process; conditions of employment; and <br />subsequent Open Meeting to ratify the final, negotiated contract. <br /> <br />3. Adjourn <br />The meeting was adjourned at 5:28 p.m. <br /> <br />Adjourn <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.