My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Solid Waste 2002 report
Roseville
>
Studies, Task Forces, Special Committees, Reports
>
2002 Residential Solid Waste & Recycling Citizens AC
>
Solid Waste 2002 report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 1:17:05 PM
Creation date
5/24/2012 10:30:09 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota); Seven Mile Creek Landfill in Eau Claire, Wisconsin is owned <br />by Superior Services; Waste Management owns Timberline Trail Disposal Facility in Rusk <br />County, Wisconsin and the Central Disposal Systems landfill in Lake Mills, Iowa. Walter's has a <br />contract to deliver waste from its transfer station to the Seven Mile Creek Landfill. <br />When Ramsey and Washington Counties set up the agreement with NRG to build and operate the <br />Resource Recovery Facility (RRF), the Counties could mandate that garbage haulers take all the <br />waste they collect to the RRF. In the 1994 case Cabone vs. Clarkstown the U.S. Supreme Court <br />ruled that trash hauling is interstate commerce. This meant that the Counties' could no longer <br />mandate residents' trash be taking to the RRF. This opened the door for haulers to increase out of <br />state landfilling mentioned previously because it was cheaper for them to do so. Cities with <br />organized collection can require haulers use a resource recovery facility because haulers can <br />voluntarily enter into contracts with cities and counties in which they agree to take garbage where <br />the city or county designates. <br />During the 2001 session Minnesota lawmakers gave the counties money to offset the higher <br />tipping fees at waste to energy facilities. Because of a budget shortfall, no such proposal is <br />included in this year's budget. <br />Ramsey and Washington Counties offered <br />artificially low tipping fees in 2002 of $32 a ton <br />to any hauler that agreed to take all the trash it <br />collected in the Counties to the RRF. As a <br />result, during the last ten days of 2001, BFI, <br />Waste Management and Superior all agreed to <br />one year contracts to haul all their garbage to the <br />RRF. This came at the same time the Counties <br />were investigating mandating organized collec- <br />tion in part to decrease the amount of garbage being taken out of state and to increase the amount <br />of garbage going to the RRF. The large haulers have not said what they will do when the low <br />tipping fees expire at the end of 2002. But they are under no obligation to follow the State's <br />hierarchy for dealing with waste. And competitive pressures can be at odds with the State's, the <br />County's and Roseville's environmental goals. <br />Licensing <br />Ramsey County requires haulers to hold a County license. The County requires insurance, <br />various safety standards and that a portion of the waste collected is sent to the Resource Recovery <br />Facility (RRF) in Newport, Minnesota. <br />According to Roseville City Attorney Joel Jamnik, Roseville could not require as part of its <br />garbage hauler licensing that haulers take garbage to the RRF. Instead haulers are free to dispose <br />of Roseville garbage in any manner they wish fit that does not violate state or federal environ- <br />mental regulations. Haulers participating in a focus group with the Committee said they make <br />disposal decision based primarily on cost. <br />Roseville's licensing requirements for residential dwellings include: weekly collection of <br />.� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.