My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Solid Waste 2002 report
Roseville
>
Studies, Task Forces, Special Committees, Reports
>
2002 Residential Solid Waste & Recycling Citizens AC
>
Solid Waste 2002 report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 1:17:05 PM
Creation date
5/24/2012 10:30:09 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
To gauge public opinion the committee took several steps: <br />� Conducted mail surveys of a scientifically selected sample of homeowners and <br />multi-family complex residents; <br />� Conducted focus group discussions with homeowners, multi-family complex <br />residents, multi-family complex owners and managers, and waste haulers; 8 <br />Received phone call and mail comments solicited by an article in the "Roseville <br />Wrap" resident newsletter; and <br />� Conducted a public workshop at the Roseville Skating Center in which residents <br />came to share their thoughts on recycling and garbage collection. <br />As they discussed options, committee members decided that consumers should take some respon- <br />sibility to find proper means of disposal for all the things they no longer wish to have. Residents <br />should not rely solely on government programs to manage their waste. Although City programs <br />can raise awareness of waste issues by managing some waste while educating residents about <br />waste issues. Committee members believe government can help residents become fully informed <br />about product stewardship, the dangers of grass clippings in the storm water system, the environ- <br />mental and economic impacts of purchasing and waste choices, and other garbage and recycling <br />issues. If residents are fully informed, they will be empowered to make decisions about their <br />waste choices and use economic forces to create a waste system that best meets their needs. For <br />instance will they know to ask before they buy something new if the store will take it back when <br />it wears out? Or maybe they will switch to a smaller garbage cart after using a backyard compost <br />bin for food scraps and yard waste. <br />Using the knowledge gained from their activities, Committee members determined what they saw <br />as the elements of an effective solid waste and recycling system and then ranked them in order of <br />importance. (Find a detailed ]ist in Appendix A). <br />Rank <br />1 <br />2 <br />2 (tie) <br />4 <br />5 <br />5 (tie) <br />7 <br />0 <br />What are the elements of an effective solid waste and recycling system? <br />Element <br />Environmentally preferred management of waste. <br />Reasonable cost <br />Good Customer Service <br />Education <br />Simple and Convenient <br />Access to Service <br />Customer Choice <br />Expanded Opportunities for Disposal of Difficult Items <br />Reduce Traffic <br />Committee members used the City Council's environmental goals as well as our list of elements <br />of an effective solid waste and recycling system and our knowledge of solid waste and recycling <br />policies and programs as we deliberated various options that could be incorporated into a com- <br />prehensive Roseville recycling and garbage system. <br />The results of the Committee's deliberations are contained in this report being submitted to the <br />Roseville City Council in May 2002. <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.