My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Solid Waste 2002 report
Roseville
>
Studies, Task Forces, Special Committees, Reports
>
2002 Residential Solid Waste & Recycling Citizens AC
>
Solid Waste 2002 report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 1:17:05 PM
Creation date
5/24/2012 10:30:09 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
language of note was Spanish (0.3%). The rest are not listed. <br />Corcoran also found it important to ineet regularly with multi-family complex owners and man- <br />agers to discuss their concerns about how the program was operating. She found that even <br />though all owners were assessed a recycling fee, a small percentage refused to participate in the <br />collection program. <br />In a focus group discussion with multi-family owners and managers in Roseville not all ex- <br />pressed a desire to participate in the City's recycling program. Some said their complexes were <br />built before central storage of garbage and recycling became wide spread. Thus they could not <br />easily site recycling bins without having to eliminate parking spots. Others felt a requirement to <br />add recycling would interfere with their ability to operate their buildings. <br />What Other Cities Do <br />Fifteen Ramsey County cities (out of 17) have organized collection of recycling. SiY of those 15 <br />include multi-family complexes in their recycling program (two, North Oaks and Gem Lake, do <br />not have any multi-family housing). Haulers charge by the unit. For instance Was�e Management <br />charges Shoreview $1.09 per unit to collect recycling at multi-family complexes and Brooklyn <br />Park $1.12 per unit. Those cities pass that fee along to multi-family complex owners. <br />Not all Minnesota cities where recycling is made available to multi-family complex residents do <br />so by including those residents in the city's program. For instance in Mounds View all licensed <br />garbage haulers are required to offer recycling service as well. The City leaves it up to building <br />owners and garbage haulers to work out the details of how that service will be provided. Mounds <br />View provides no oversight. Dakota County sets minimum standards for what products are to be <br />accepted for recycling, but again leaves it up to building owners and haulers to work out details. <br />Options Considered: <br />1) Maintain current program without incurring the additional cost of providing recycling <br />service to multi-family complexes. Work aggressively with multi-family complex owners <br />and managers to convince them to offer recycling services. <br />2) Meet the above stated environmental goals by expanding the current program to include <br />multi-family complexes. The cost of approximately $1.10 per unit per month be assessed <br />to multi-family owners and managers. Work aggressively with multi-family owners and <br />managers to coordinate implementation and on-going education campaigns on recycling. <br />3) Meet the above stated environmental goal by requiring all licensed garbage haulers that <br />service multifamily complexes offer recycling service as well, leaving details for owners <br />and haulers to determine. <br />4) Stop billing multi-family complexes for recycling at a cost to the City of 8,145.36 while <br />providing no service and risk losing SCORE funding of more than $60,000 a year. <br />55 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.