My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Citizen Advisory Recommendations
Roseville
>
Studies, Task Forces, Special Committees, Reports
>
2002 Residential Solid Waste & Recycling Citizens AC
>
Citizen Advisory Recommendations
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 12:15:09 PM
Creation date
5/24/2012 10:38:35 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Given the current economics of the waste collection industry, i�he majoriry of Committee mem- <br />bers believe the best way to achieve environmentally preferrcd management of waste is through a <br />contract with a consortium consisting of aIl ihe current haulers in Rosevil�e (as was done in <br />Vadnais Heights and Little Canada). These consortiums typically divide the cities into zones <br />with one hauler assigned to each zone. Howcver, Roseville may require more than one hauler per <br />zone in order to preserve customer choice. Such service may cost residents more than a single <br />hauler per zone system. <br />That contract is the only way where the City can specify that waste be managed using what is <br />currently the en�vironmentally preferred waste method: a resource recovery facility. <br />Additionally, and in light of thc ever changing waste management laz�dscape, the Committee <br />strongly believes the City should monitor developments by the State, County and private sector to <br />determine if a future alternative might better meet the City's and State's environmental goals and <br />balance citizen interests and concerns. <br />Furthermore, the Committee believes a waste rnanagement systcm consisting of a consortium of <br />current private waste haulers in collaboration with the City could also provide the following <br />benefits to Roseville residents: <br />O Negotiated lower rates to customers (the top priority of the majority of residents <br />surveyed — 53%) <br />4 Preserve customer choice (the second highest priority of residents surveyed — 40%) <br />O Limited truck traffic that reduces wear and tear on streets, thus reducing or delaying <br />property tax assessments for road maintenance or replacement <br />O Limited truck traffic that reduces air pollution, noise pollution and improves or en- <br />hances neighborhood safety and appearance <br />O Strong performance and incen#ive-based contract provisions that would guarantee a <br />high level of customer service <br />O�'rovide residents with clear, annual delineation af haulers' services and <br />rates <br />O Expand and enhance residents' knowledge about the fiill range of public and private <br />services and costs for disposal of difficult items <br />T1ne Committee recognizes that there are Rosevilie residents who would not want the City Coun- <br />cil to restrict their ability to choose a garbage hauler, and that there are concerns about how <br />government involvcmcnt with the consortium of haulers might irnpact cost, service atzd small <br />haulers' viability. The Committee understands those concerns and believes a City contract with a <br />consortium of all the current haulers in Roseville will preserve market share for sma11 haulers, <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.