My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Report to Council
Roseville
>
Studies, Task Forces, Special Committees, Reports
>
1986 Residential Waste Management Alternatives Study
>
Report to Council
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 1:15:50 PM
Creation date
5/24/2012 11:03:54 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />�J <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />J <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />RECENT LEGISLATTON <br />S�ate of Minnesota Role: <br />In 1980, the Legislature passed the Waste Management Act (WMA) <br />charging the met�opolitan region with fi.nding alternatives to <br />landfills. Later amendments gave authdr�.ty to the Metropolitan <br />Council to develop a regianal policy plan for waste abatement and <br />cessa-tion of landfill practices, gave responsibilities to the <br />counties far developing a Solid Waste Master Plan based on the <br />Council.'s Guide/Pol�cy Plan, and divided the responsibility for <br />implementation ot the Master Plan between cities and business <br />generators. Coun�ies were given the authority to adopt a <br />:nandatary source separation ordinance. A Solid Waste Master Plan <br />must i.ncl,ude landfill abatement objectives for both counties and <br />citi�s in that county. The WMA required that unprocessed solid <br />waste not be disposed of at the landfills in the Twin Cities <br />Metropolitan Area beginn.ing January 1, 1990. <br />Cities may receive $4.00 per year for each <br />recyclables (excluding yard wastes) collected <br />addition, 1984 legislation provides up to 50 <br />per year to cities for source separation <br />received permission to levy taxes beyond the <br />for the costs of implementing waste reduction <br />tian programs. <br />Metropolitan Council Role: <br />ton of household <br />and recyc].ed. In <br />cents per household <br />activities. C�ties <br />normal limits to pay <br />and source separa- <br />The Metro Counci� provides a long-range plan, through its Solid <br />Waste Management Deve�opment Guide/Policy P�an, for managing <br />soJ.id waste in the region. The plan pravides for the reduction <br />of waste, the recovery of materials and energy, and controls the <br />prac'tice of landtill use. It a�so sets regional waste management <br />policy and goals, and provides schedules for developing waste <br />facilities and activities to manage solid waste through the year <br />aaoo. <br />Ramsey Caunty_ Rale: <br />The Ramse Count Solid Waste Mana ement Master Plan (presently <br />� in draft forrn) requires the county to reduce the need for land- <br />fiJ.ls ta the greatest ext�nt possible. To avoid landfilling <br />unprocessed wastes, Ramsey County will i�nplemen� prograrns in <br />� waste reduct.ion, source separation, and resource recovery. <br />Organized refuse collection is endorsed as a way to help pay for <br />expanded waste abatement programs without increasing the cost to <br />the public. The County has the authority to adopt a mandatory <br />� source separation ordinance, which would be in effect for the <br />cities that haven't achieved abatement goals by January 1, 1988. <br />� <br />� <br />City of Roseville Role: <br />The City Council of Roseville has the opti.on of participating in <br />Ramse Count 's Solid Waste Mana ement Plan by implementing resi- <br />dentia� solid waste abatement as a community effozt. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.