My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Report to Council
Roseville
>
Studies, Task Forces, Special Committees, Reports
>
1986 Residential Waste Management Alternatives Study
>
Report to Council
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 1:15:50 PM
Creation date
5/24/2012 11:03:54 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Leaf camposting is given considerable atiention in the 1985 <br />Abatement Pro ress Re ort to the Minnesota Legislative Commission <br />on Waste Management. Eight grass/leaf compost programs in the <br />metropo�itan area are profiled in the report. Of these eight <br />areas, only three (Minneapolis, Roseville and White Bear Lake) <br />are "leaves only" 51t�5. In 1985, almost 6,000 tons af leaves <br />were amassed at the �ight sites for a yield of nearly 25,oaa <br />cubic yards of compost. <br />Participa�ion in source separation by Ramsey County residents <br />through curbside pickup and drop-off centers is expected to <br />remove six percen� of the mixed household wastes from the waste <br />stream in 1988. This would increase to n�neteen percent in 1990 <br />and thereafter. - Assuming Raseville residents continue to <br />generate waste at an annual average of 2.5 lbs./persan/day, each <br />of the approximately 9,�00 single family households* would, at <br />2,57 persons/household average, be source separating (yard wastes <br />and recyclables) approximately 2.7 lbs./week in 1988 and 8.5 <br />lbs./week in 1990. <br />To achieve the goals of waste abatement, both the Council and <br />Coun�y acknowledge that the results ar� entirely dependent on <br />participation by the waste generator. Although the County has <br />the authority to impose mandatory saurce separation, �oluntary <br />participation is definitely preferred. <br />Public awareness and education programs directed at waste abate- <br />ment are necessary to enhance continuing voluntary participation <br />by the waste generator. Such programs should focus on: <br />o the role of the waste generator as a first�link in the <br />overall waste management system. <br />0 <br />� <br />c <br />benefits of waste abatement. <br />changes necessary to change 'old habits' of waste disposal. <br />methods and goals of residential waste abatement. <br />o grass roots activities, including citizen participation in <br />imporfiant decisions on waste abatemEnt plans and projects, <br />Awareness and educational p�ograms are expected to be p�ovided by <br />goverivnental units, waste haulers, schools, environmental and <br />other citizen groups. For example: <br />Metropolitan Council <br />Publish newsletter on solid waste. Continue to publish <br />Recycle It, and develop computer-phone network fox access to <br />Recycle It listings. Provide person-to-person technical <br />assistance for counties and municipalities. <br />Counties <br />Plan and supervise publicity compaigns far county-wide reduction <br />and recovery plans. Imp�ement cer�ain county-wide publicity <br />tools (newspapers, etc.). <br />* Includes duplexes through fourplexes. <br />25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.