My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_0514
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_0514
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2012 1:03:23 PM
Creation date
5/24/2012 1:03:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/14/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,May 14,2012 <br /> Page 13 <br /> holders, for a more detailed framework, as well as funding options or incentives <br /> while recognizing the limited resources of the City and past history of not <br /> spending more money after bad. Councilmember Johnson opined that it made <br /> sense to have that discussion considering that the development economy was <br /> not going exceptionally well at this time. <br /> Vice Chair Gisselquist opined that the Twin Lakes issue was not going to be <br /> solved; however, he expressed appreciation for tonight's debate and his under- <br /> standing that the confusion was not only his. Vice Chair Gisselquist recognized <br /> the anguish of business owners in that area, and the implications for them and <br /> their heirs. From his perspective in considering the lack of clarity for the Regu- <br /> lating Map and the history of past documents and studies, Vice Chair Gissel- <br /> quist stated that he remained unsure of the City's advocacy or role in developing <br /> the area; however, he saw business as usual unless the City chose to do some- <br /> thing drastic. <br /> Councilmember Johnson opined that one successful development in the area <br /> may foster others; and then the Regulating Map would guide additional devel- <br /> opment, and anticipated a burst of development subsequent to the first one. <br /> Commissioner Boguszewski concurred with Councilmember Johnson. <br /> Mayor Roe, noting the historical trend in other areas, opined that it made sense <br /> to look at strategies and what the City was willing to do as a community to <br /> move forward, whether financially, organizationally, or with more concrete <br /> guidelines. Referencing the comments of Vice Chair Gisselquist, Mayor Roe <br /> concurred that, given the age of the Twin Lakes Study in 2001 (or 1999 at its <br /> inception), it may be prudent to review it and update it, to ensure its objectives <br /> and the location of and rationale for development are sufficiently addressed. <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that she was open to suggestions; and had <br /> previously asked Community Development Director Trudgeon to come forward <br /> with figures for purchase of some parcels in the Twin Lakes Redevelopment <br /> Area. Councilmember McGehee concurred with Councilmember Johnson for <br /> the need to initiate something; however, she cautioned that if the City started <br /> with the wrong thing, it may prove detrimental to the City. If talking about tax <br /> increment financing (TIF) or other investment of public monies, Councilmem- <br /> ber McGehee opined that there was a need to provide leadership and a basis for <br /> a good tax base return to residents of Roseville, and goes beyond "break even" <br /> or does not become a drain on the community. Councilmember McGehee <br /> opined that she was not opposed to TIF as long as it provided an economic re- <br /> turn for citizens. <br /> Commissioner Boguszewski opined that the Planning Commission was in <br /> agreement, as long as there was a net gain for the City. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.