CC_Minutes_2012_0514 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Workspace Webmail:: Print http://emai114.secureserver.nebview_print__multi.php?uidArray=2244... 1010.03 E.5 refers to no refund of an inspection fee, but 1010.03 E.6 does not indicate that there is a fee for inspection (nor does E.2). Since the inspection fee is covered under the permit,the reference to a separate inspection fee should be stricken. Shouldn't 1010.04 D.2.a preferably refer to the Fee Schedule adopted by the City Council, rather than to section 710 (which might require changing 710 also)? YES—The reference to 710 is incorrect and should be the fee schedule adopted by the City Council. Likewise with the $50 and $100 fines in 1010.04 E.1? This was discussed—the short answer is if the Council feels that it is best to place in fee schedule we can live with that. However, it have been placed in the sign ordinance because. this is where applicants can see that a fine exists;what the fines are and how we enforce; and because I do not anticipate the fine increasing like other fees. Should "perpetual violation" be defined either under definitions or in 1010.04 E.2? Also, should the ordinance list who is responsible for deeming a sign as a perpetual violation, for example the CD Dept or CD Director or designee? And, should there be a an opportunity indicated in the ordinance here for an appeal of such a designation? A definition can be added in either location if you feel that one is necessary. Is the language at the end of paragraph A of 1010.05 redundant of the language in 1010.03 C.3? (If so, I'd suggest moving it to replace the language in 1010.03 C.3.) If you are referring to the below sections—I can see where we the language referring to a bus bench can be viewed as redundant. However, adding the exception in 1010.03C3 only adds clarity as I see it and does no harm. 1010.03C3 No sign will overhang the public right-of-way, sidewalk easement, walkway easement, or bicycle path easement except a bus bench or approved trash container at a designated public transportation pick-up location. 1010.05A Signs shall not be permitted within the public right-of-way or easements except on benches and shelters that have received permits as per Section 703.05 of this code, and newspaper and cabstands, all of which shall be as governed by Chapter 901 and Section 703 of this code. City, county, state, and federal traffic directional signs are permitted. Does the area requirement in 1010.07 A.3 apply to balloons and/or searchlights? (How would we calculate the area for a balloon?) NO-we do not calculate searchlights or balloons. Likewise, does the quantity limit in 1010.07 A.5 apply to balloons and/or searchlights? We do not limit the quantity of either—I have only issued searchlight permits to HOM Furniture (2-3 per year) and only balloons to three separate businesses in the past five years. Such issues have not come up in the past,but perhaps specific language could be developed for searchlights and/or balloons if that is the desire of the Council. 2 of 3 5/14/2012 4:58 PM