My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_0514
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_0514
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2012 1:03:23 PM
Creation date
5/24/2012 1:03:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/14/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Workspace Webmail ::Print http://emaill4.secureserver.net/view_print multi.pbp?uidArray=2244... <br /> In 1010.08, paragraph A, is the use of the word "may" intentional, as opposed to "shall?" <br /> YES—I believe implies that we are not obligated to issue if the requirements below <br /> subsection A are not achieved. <br /> Should 1010.11 C.4 still refer to Planned Unit Developments, when we do not have them <br /> in our zoning code anymore? <br /> The Zoning Ordinance does not include the Planned Unit Development as a type of zoning or <br /> approval process,but the City is still contractually obligated by the ones that have previously <br /> been approved. Since most PUD's are unique it stands to reason that the Master Sign Plan <br /> would be a good mechanism to use given some of the challenges and constraints that may be <br /> present on a lot or parcel verses having to amend the PUD just for signage. My recollection is <br /> that most PUD's approved in my years as City Planner were done so with the requirement of <br /> the signage requirements at the time and not specific language. Centre Pointe is a good <br /> example of a PUD that the MSP works well to assist each property with signage needs and <br /> limitations. <br /> Also, I have added in"Unified Development" in those instances where a PUD does not cover <br /> similar types of developments, such as the area that includes Starbucks Coffee, Golfsmith and <br /> M & IBank. <br /> Should there be any further questions,please feel free to email of call me. <br /> Thomas R. Paschke <br /> Roseville City Planner <br /> 2660 Civic Center Drive <br /> (651) 792-7074 <br /> Confidentiality Statement:The documents accompanying this transmission contain confidential information that is legaly privileged.This information <br /> is intended only for the use of the individuals or entities listed above.If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, <br /> copying,distribution,or action taken in reliance on the contents of these documents is strictly prohibited.If you have received this information in <br /> error,please notify the sender immediately and arrange for the return or destruction of these documents. <br /> Copyright 0 2003-2012.All rights reserved. <br /> 3 of 3 5/14/2012 4:58 PM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.