Laserfiche WebLink
Seventy-four percent favored a limit on the number of <br />gambling permits: <br />SiJPPORT ...................................74� <br />OPPOSE.... ..............................23$ <br />DON'T KN�W/REFUSED .........................4� <br />Twenty-three percent opposed. <br />Limits drew higher support from $75,000-$87,500 yearly <br />income hauseholds and Zone 3 residents. <br />Supporters of a limit on permits were asked as a fallow-up: <br />The City has currently issued eiqht <br />licenses. How many licenses do you <br />feel should be issued? <br />Most would cap the number of licenses at the current level: <br />AS IS (EIGHT) .............................24% <br />NONE......................................10$ <br />ONE - SEVEN ................................6% <br />NINE +•---• ................................9� <br />There was also significant support for decreasing that number. <br />Single seniors and $12,500-$25,000 yearly income households <br />were more apt to support the status quo. 45-54 year olds wexe <br />most likely to favor no licenses. <br />The City may wish to consider this cap on the number of <br />licenses as part of an approach ta regu].ating the activity. <br />Strictly requlate the activity and provide automatic penalties <br />�or violations. <br />Eighty-five percent supported this approach: <br />SUPPORT ...................................85% <br />OPPOSE ....................................12� <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED .........................4% <br />Opposition was minimal. <br />High school graduates were more often in opposition to <br />strict regulation with automatic penalties. <br />.� <br />