Laserfiche WebLink
Fifty-nine percent perceived the pipelines as a"very great" or <br />"moderate" public safety concern: <br />VERY GREAT ................................23� <br />MODERATE ..................................36� <br />SMALL .....................................22� <br />NOT AT ALL ................................12$ <br />DON'T ItNOW/REFUSED .........................7� <br />Thirty-four percent rated the concern lawer. <br />The pipeline was a"very great" cancern for: <br />* Senior couples <br />* Over 6� year olds <br />* some coZlege education <br />* Zone 3 residents <br />It was a"moderate" concern for: <br />* 5-9 unit apartment building residents <br />� $25,000-$37,500 yearly income households <br />The pipeline is a"small" public safety concern for: <br />� Single seniors <br />* 25-34 year olds <br />A majority, then, see both the pipeline and the storage tanks as <br />public safety concerns. <br />Citizens were then asked for their opinion about the funding <br />af protective services to minimize the risks of the presence of <br />those hazardous materials in the community: <br />As you may know, the City muat provide <br />various protective services to mini- <br />mize the risks associated with the <br />presence of hazardous materfals, such <br />as chemical spilis and qasoline fires. <br />which of the foilowing ways do you <br />feel the City should use to cover the <br />cost of these serviaes? <br />A. General property tases on all <br />property; <br />8. IIser fees from hazardous materials <br />aompanies. <br />Ninety-five percent felt the programs should be funded through <br />102 <br />