Laserfiche WebLink
RESIDENTIAL �NLY ..........................29% <br />RETAIL.....................................4� <br />OFFICE/COMMERCYAL .........................�4� <br />LIGHT INDUSTRY ............................11$ <br />RECREATIONAL ...............................4� <br />APARTMENTS .................................2� <br />SCATTERED RESPONSES ........................2� <br />NO ANSWER .................................27� <br />Office and light industrial development ranked second. No-grawth <br />was opined by only nine percent of the sample. <br />Qver 65 year olds supported no further development. <br />"Residential" was a favorite of: <br />* Owner-Manager households <br />* Some college education <br />A judicious mix would be acceptable to most residents. <br />Next, the converse query was raised: <br />there any type of development which <br />you would stronqly oppose attractinq <br />to Rosevilla? <br />Further retail development was most unpopular, cited by twenty- <br />eight percent: <br />NONE......................................11� <br />RESIDENTIAL ................................2� <br />RETAIL ....................................28% <br />OFFICE/COMMERCIAL ..........................8� <br />INDUSTRIAL ................................13� <br />INCINERATOR ................................4% <br />APARTMENTS ................................12% <br />SCATTERED RESPONSES ........................5� <br />NO ANSWER .................................18� <br />More apartment and industrial development also incurred moderate <br />levels of hostility. <br />Senior singles were more likely to oppose "none." <br />"Retail" was a sore point for: <br />* 35-44 year olds <br />* Some college education <br />* $50,000-$62,500 yearly income households <br />* Zone 3 residents <br />119 <br />