My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1991 Residential Survey
Roseville
>
Studies, Task Forces, Special Committees, Reports
>
Surveys
>
1991 Residential Survey
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 12:49:23 PM
Creation date
5/25/2012 10:47:47 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
��over the next decade, Roseville should place a qreater priority <br />on apartment and condominium developments alonq Highways 36 and <br />I-35W. �� <br />By over three-to-one, residents opposed placing a greater <br />priority on multiple unit residential buildings along the <br />highways: <br />STRONGLY AGREE .............................3% <br />SOMEWHAT AGREE ............................18% <br />SOMEWHAT DISAGREE .........................43% <br />STRONGLY DISAGREE .........................25� <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...................•----12$ <br />Almost one-quarter of the sample was strongly opposed to this <br />effort. <br />Disagreement soared among 18-34 year olds. <br />��over the next ten years, Roseville si►ould attract mare retail <br />development alonq Hiqh�ays 36 and I-35�.�� <br />Almost three-to-one opposition was registered against more <br />retail development along the highways: <br />STRONGLY AGREE .............................3$ <br />SOMEWHAT AGREE ............................21� <br />SOMEWHAT DISAGREE .........................40% <br />STRONGLY DISAGREE .........................27% <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED .........................9� <br />Over one-quarter of the sample was strongly against this <br />development thrust. <br />Agreement was highest among: <br />* Over 10 unit apartment building residents <br />* Blue Collar households <br />* 18-24 year olds <br />Disagreement was highest among: <br />* 5-9 unit apartment building residents <br />* Professional-Technical households <br />* 55-64 year olds <br />Of all the options for the future development of the land alang <br />124 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.