Laserfiche WebLink
Townhouses had great appeal among key segments of the citizenry. <br />"Aggressive attraction" was favored by: <br />* Over 10 unit apartment building residents <br />* Zone 1 residents <br />"Aggressive discouragement" was the course chasen by: <br />* Seniar couples <br />* High school graduates <br />* Zone 3 residents <br />Townhouse developments may turn a significant share of current <br />Roseville renters into home owners. <br />Condominiums. <br />A majority felt the City should "aggressively discourage" <br />more condominiums: <br />AGGRESS�VELY ATTRACT ......................20% <br />AGGRESSIVELY DISCOURAGE ...................56% <br />TAKE NO ACTION ............................18$ <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED .........................6% <br />Only twenty percent opted for the oppasite approach. <br />Condominiums should be "aggressively attracted" according <br />to: <br />* Senior couples <br />* Over 55 year olds <br />They shauld be "aggressively discouraged" by high school <br />graduates. <br />Post-graduates counseled "no action." <br />Condominiums, then, are attractive to many seniar hame <br />owners in the city and might induce them to move from their <br />current homes. So, while they do not hold universal appeal, they <br />do seem popular among one key portion of the citizenry. <br />Mobile bomes. <br />Mobile homes were rejected by three-quarters of the sample: <br />127 <br />