Laserfiche WebLink
AGGRESSIVELY ATTRACT ......................13� <br />AGGRESSIVELY DISCOURAGE ...................75� <br />TAKE N� ACTION .............................9% <br />DON'T KNOW/REFi7SED .........................4$ <br />This was the most unpopular of the development alternatives <br />tested, <br />"Aggressively attract" was the prescription of: <br />* Over 10 unit apartment building residents <br />* $12,500-$25,Oa0 yearly income households <br />* Zone 4 residents <br />"Aggressively discourage" was the course of action <br />recommended by: <br />* Senior couples <br />* $50,000-$62,500 & $75,000-$87,500 yearly incame <br />households <br />* Zone 3 residents <br />A mobile home park, then, would be a very controversial proposal <br />in Roseville. <br />senior citfsen apartment� and/or condominiums. <br />Just short of a majority support this direction by the City: <br />AGGRESSIVELY ATTRACT ......................49% <br />AGGRESSIVELY DISCOURAGE ...................30� <br />TAKE NO ACTION ............................16� <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED .........................6% <br />But, thirty percent evidenced antipathy toward more seniar <br />apartments and condominiums. <br />"Aggressive attraction" was favored by: <br />* Blue Collar households <br />* $25,000-$37,500 yearly income households <br />* Zone 4 residents <br />$12,500-$25,000 yearly incame households mare often saught <br />"active discouragement.�� <br />"No action" was selected by post-graduates. <br />128 <br />