Laserfiche WebLink
adjacent developmerit even if it would mean city service cutbacks <br />and property tax increases in the future. Locating new <br />development next ta existing neighborhoods will be a major public <br />relations problem for the foreseeable future. <br />Residents would like to see a mix af primarily office and <br />light industrial development with residential apportunities on <br />the truck terminals land in the western part of the city. They <br />would prioritize jobs creation and housing for this area, along <br />with improving the tax base. Recreatian and aesthetics fell far <br />behind as priorities there. By nearly two-to-one, residents <br />would support the use of incentiv�s to attract high quality <br />development to that area. They only oppose two types of expan- <br />sions on this site: retail malls and heavy industrial with <br />pollution potential. <br />On average, household members take about six one way trips <br />per day to destinations in Roseville. They take about two per <br />day to points outside of the community. The former figure is <br />somewhat higher than the suburban norm. <br />Twenty-eight percent of the respondents had used public <br />transportation, other than airlines, during the past three <br />months. Fifteen percent had used Roseville Mini-b�s Circulator <br />services during that period; in fact, most users had ridden the <br />mini-bus to go to and from Rosedale for shopping or an <br />appointment. When asked why they did not use public transporta- <br />tion more, three reasons emerged: the need for an automobile at <br />their destination or along the way, existing routes not going to <br />their desti�atian, and inconvenient service times were mentioned <br />by a majority of respondents having opinions. Smaller numbers <br />151 <br />