My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1991 Residential Survey
Roseville
>
Studies, Task Forces, Special Committees, Reports
>
Surveys
>
1991 Residential Survey
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 12:49:23 PM
Creation date
5/25/2012 10:47:47 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
services. Sixty-eight percent also feel that there are adequate <br />medica3 services available in Roseville. If a medium sized <br />medical facility with out-patient services was built in <br />Roseville, forty-eight percent of the sample indicated a <br />likel�haod to use it. Among those more negative, a preference <br />for their current medical provider, insurance requirements, and <br />location were they key factors. <br />Only fifty percent of the sample was aware of a neighborhood <br />crime watch program in their local area. Twe�ty-three percent <br />were current participants. But, an additional forty-one p�rcent <br />thought they would participate in such a program if one were <br />offered in their neighborhood. More aggressive publicity and <br />recruitment �fforts would undoubtedly result in greater <br />participation in neighborhoad crime watch programs across the <br />city. <br />On the subject of lawfui gambling, there is a remarkable <br />degree af consistency in the answer patterns of respondents. In <br />fact, responses statistically scale: that is, there are three <br />clear groups: ban gambling, "watchdogs��' and de-regulators. A <br />fifty-four percent majority fall into the middle group, those who <br />support charitabie gambling activities but all strangly support <br />more regulation and stiff automat�c penalties for violation. The <br />anti-gambling group is twenty percent, while the de-regulators <br />are sixteen percent. <br />In ter�ris of individual behavior, sixty-two percent of the <br />community reported gambling during the past year. The most often <br />cited activity was the purchase of Minnesota state lottery <br />tickets. Pull-tabs were next at twenty-seven percent, bingo, at <br />thirteen percent, and tip boards, at ten percent. Hence, a <br />majority of residents already at least periodically gamble. <br />Fitty-four percent of the community saia�AAMCO and Williams <br />Pipeline Companies storage tank facilities as at least a moderate <br />public safety concern. Fifty-nine percent'viewed the pipeline <br />similarly. In �ine with these concerns, ninety-five percent felt <br />that user fees from hazardous materials companies should be <br />collected ta provide various protective sex�vices minimizing the <br />risks associated with the presence of those materials in <br />Roseville. <br />The City Staff received a job approval rating of seventy- <br />five percent and a disapproval ratir�g of nine percent. Both the <br />absolute levei of approval and the almost nine-to-one ratio ot <br />approval-to-disapproval are among the highest in the Metropolitan <br />Area. The thirty-nine percent of the residents reporting first- <br />hand contact with the staff is much higher than comparable <br />suburban ar�as. The approval ratings of staff stemmed primarily <br />from good experiences with them; the negative ratings resulted <br />from feelings that the staff could improve. Not only is the <br />staff serving an innrdinate number of citizens, it is doing so <br />extremely well. <br />C'� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.