My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1991 Residential Survey
Roseville
>
Studies, Task Forces, Special Committees, Reports
>
Surveys
>
1991 Residential Survey
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 12:49:23 PM
Creation date
5/25/2012 10:47:47 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
provided to residents, even though its usership level is <br />comparativaly high. <br />Recreational Priorities: <br />Respondents were asked: <br />�hioh of the followinq should be the <br />chief recreational priority of the City.. <br />A. Upqradinq current park facilities; <br />B. increasinq outdoor recreational <br />facilities; <br />C. Developing additional active park <br />facilities, such as ball fields and <br />playgrounds; <br />D. Developinq additional passive park <br />faCilities, such as walkinq trails <br />and flower qardens? <br />Priorities D, develaping additional passive park facilities, and <br />A, upgrading current park facilities, were the plurality choices: <br />PRIORITY A ................................25� <br />PRIORITY B ................................Z2� <br />PRIORITY C ................................12� <br />PRIORITY D ................................31� <br />ALL OF ABOVE (VOLUNTEERED) .................8% <br />NONE OF ABOVE (VOLUNTEERED) ................7� <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED .........................5� <br />The remaining two priorities were selected by less than half of <br />thase endorsing each of the priority leaders. <br />Priority A was chosen most often by: <br />* Households containing children <br />* 35-44 year olds <br />* $37,500-$50,000 yearly income households <br />Priority D was a favorite of: <br />* Senior singles <br />* Retirees <br />* 45-54 year olds <br />* High school graduates <br />For future planning purposes, the City may wish to keep these two <br />citizen priorities in mind. <br />72 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.