Laserfiche WebLink
Summary and Conclusions: <br />An impressive ninety-six percent rate the park facilities in <br />Roseville as either "excellent" or "good." This rating is at the <br />top of the Metrapolitan Area. In addition, eighty-six percent <br />similarly rate the indoor recreational facilities currently <br />offered in Roseville. This is particularly impressive in view of <br />the almost eighty percent who feel at least "somewhat well <br />informed" about the park system and its facilities. Residents <br />are very praud of their park and recreation system. <br />Respondents were asked to rate the components of the park <br />and recreation system with which they were familiar. Central <br />Park led the ratings, with eighty-five percent expressing <br />approval; the remainder were unable to rate the Park, rather than <br />dissatisfied with it. In fact, in the case of most ratings, <br />unfamiliarity rather than discontent was the norm. Seventy-five <br />percent approved of the neighborhood parks, while sixty-nine <br />percent similarly rated the park trails. Fifty-one percent gave <br />good grades to the city's picnic shelters, while forty-three <br />percent similarly viewed the community's softball fields. All but <br />one of the remaining facilities -- Cedarholm Golf Course, outdoor <br />ice rinks, paved pathways, and the Ice Arena -- scored about <br />thirty-three percent approval ratings. Gymnasium space was rated <br />highly by only fourteen percent because most residents were <br />unaware of the present offerings. Overall, each component of the <br />park system is highly valued by its users. <br />Next, residents were asked about their support for potential <br />additions to the park and recreation 5175tEIR. By nearly three-to- <br />one, residents favored the construction of a multi-purpose <br />75 <br />