Laserfiche WebLink
<br />of the public will be better served if these easements are vacated and replaced with dedicated public <br />easements in the plat of Gateway Business Park: <br />a) The underground water easement, together with access and incidental rights, as set forth in the <br />instrument dated April 22, 1965 and filed and recorded in the Office of the Ramsey County Recorder on May <br />20, 1965 in Book 1966 on page 590 and as further described in the affidavit recorded in the Office of the <br />Ramsey County Recorder on October 8, 1965 as Document No. 1659690; <br />b) The portion of the easement created in the instrument dated May 15, 1947 and filed in the Office <br />of the Ramsey County Registrar of Titles on November 7, 1949 as Document No. 272895 that is within the <br />boundaries of the plat of Gateway Business Park; <br />c) The public roadway and utility easements set forth in the Grant of Easement dated June 3, 1992 <br />and recorded in the Office of the Ramsey County Recorder on July 14, 1992 as Document No. 981840 and <br />recorded in the Office of the Ramsey County Recorder on August 3, 1992 as document No. 2665836; <br />d) The easement for underground water mains, pipes and appurtenances, together with access and <br />incidental rights as set forth in the Easement filed in the Office ofthe Ramsey County Registrar of Titles on <br />July 24, 1970 as Document No. 548096. <br /> <br />4. The City Council finds that the vacation of the easements described in Section 3 is in the best <br />interests of the public and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sect. 412.851, the City Council hereby vacates the <br />easements described in Section 3. The vacation is conditioned upon the recording and filing of the plat of <br />Gateway Business Park and is not effective until the recording and filing of the plat of Gateway Business Park. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member Maschka <br />and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Maschka, Mastel, Wiski, <br />Goedeke and Wall <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: None <br /> <br />WHEREUPON, said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br /> <br />STATE OF MINNESOTA) <br />COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) ss. <br />CITY OF ROSEVILLE ) <br /> <br />I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Manager of the City of Roseville, County of <br />Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully comparedthe attached and <br />foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 28th day of April, <br />1997, with the original thereof on file in my office. <br /> <br />Adopted by the Council this 8th day of September, 1997. <br /> <br />City Manager <br /> <br />(SEAL) <br /> <br />J:\CHAR\ WP51CH\RESOLUTI\GA TEW A YE.v AC <br />