My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004 Agendas and Packets
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Human Rights Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
2004 Agendas and packets
>
2004 Agendas and Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 11:32:31 AM
Creation date
5/25/2012 3:00:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Home and Garden Fair <br />Commissioner Wagner reported that he staffed the Human Rights Commission booth at the Home and <br />Garden Fair. The booth was in the west side of th.e building away &om the exhibitors sa did not see a <br />lot of foot traffic. He also raised the question about whether fairgoers are interested in learning about <br />Hutnan Rights issues. The Commission will review whether it is worth our time to participate in next <br />year's fair. <br />HRC Procedures to Respond to Complaints <br />Caralyn Curti distributed a letter from City Attomey Jay Squires that responded to the Commission's <br />request for information about procedures that police foltow when someone files a complaint. <br />Commissioner Delmore asked for clarification about state statute and City Codes. Commissioner <br />Steve Smith explained that statutes pertaining to Human Rights Commissions are pennissive language <br />giving a city the option to do certain things, but it is up to the City Council to direct the Commission to <br />take specific actions. That direction is spelled out in the City Code. The Commission can propose <br />changes to the City Council if the Commission wants to amend the Humai� Rights Comrnission's <br />charge. <br />Commissioner De�more asked for further explanation for minutes from June 2001 in which the City <br />Attorney said that the Commission should not apologize for an incident due to liability concerns. <br />Commissioner Smith also explained that there is a difference between apologizing for a bias incident <br />and apalogizing for what the City has done. The Commission is a part of the City and an apology may <br />be perceived as an admission of guilt which may prevent the City andlor victim from receiving a fair <br />hearing. <br />Chair McKenzie gave examples about how the Commission responded when human rights viotations <br />allegations were filed in the past. <br />Commissioners discussed the Bias Hate Crime Response Plan. Some Corximissioners felt that it needs <br />to be updated. Carolyn Curti will send the document to Commissioners ta review and update, if <br />needed. <br />Carolyn Curti discussed the Minnesota Department of Human Rights report of the types of complaints <br />filed in Roseville in 2Q02 and 2003. The majority of complaints were in the area of employment. <br />Curti suggested that the Commission may want to revisit the issue of working with businesses to <br />understand Human Rights Act. <br />Councrl, Department Head, Commission Chair Meeting <br />Chair McKenzie said she attended a goal selting meeting with Council members, Department Heads <br />and Commission Chairs. Some of the issues of interest to the Cornrnission included getting people of <br />color to purchase homes in the community and meeting needs for a diverse population. She said the <br />group also discussed perrnanent ways to address the budget reduction. <br />Adjournment <br />Phil Crump moved and Mark Chapin seconded the motion to adjourn. Meeting adjourned af 5:10 p.m. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.