Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 12/18/06 <br />Minutes - Page 32 <br /> <br />the intention that the second phase be implemented in 2007 <br />for 2008 payable taxes. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough reluctantly supported the motion; <br />opining that he didn't want to take anything away from the <br />Police, Fire or Park Improvement Funds; and sought <br />clarification from Mr. Miller on the increase per household <br />represented and the home valuation used. <br /> <br />Mr. Miller advised that he had used the average - one-half <br />median - home value in Roseville of $200,000. Mr. <br />Miller, using the same calculations, with the proposed <br />motion, advised that the typical homeowner would save <br />approximately $.75/month, or roughly 2.5%. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing spoke against the motion; opining that last <br />year's discussion was that use of reserves was advocated <br />as a temporary measure, and had been used in previous <br />years as well. Mayor Klausing further opined that, the <br />Council's attempts to be financially responsible and <br />conservative, didn't seem appropriate if reserve funds were <br />used annually on an ongoing basis. Mayor Klausing <br />clarified that consideration was not for increasing reserves, <br />but simply balancing them and not using them to meet <br />operational expenses. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pust, prior to her election to the Council, <br />had listened to discussions last year; and the concept of <br />using reserve funds was identified as only to be done on a <br />limited basis, and the practice eliminated as soon as <br />possible. Councilmember Pust opined that the same <br />argument about phasing could be used, that it could be <br />ongoing. Councilmember Pust spoke in opposition to the <br />motion; opining that it was more prudent to end the <br />practice now, and discontinue using reserve funds for <br />operational expenses. <br /> <br />Councilmember Maschka spoke in oppOSitIOn to the <br />motion; noting that due to state aid reductions and/or <br />eliminations, the City had started with a $750,000 <br />structural budget problem; and over the last three years it <br />