My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2002_0417_packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Charter Commission
>
Agenda/Minutes
>
2002
>
2002_0417_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 10:50:55 AM
Creation date
6/1/2012 1:28:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Roseville Charter Commission <br />Roseville City Hall Council Chambers <br />Minutes of Meeting of November 2a, 20Q1 <br />Call to Order/Roll Call The meeting was called to order at 7:04 p.m. by C�air Robert Bell. Afl <br />members were present <br />li. Approval of Minutes The minutes of the October 17, 2001 meeting were appro�ed with one minor <br />spelling correction. <br />Agenda Change — Agenda item !II {Annual Report to the District Court) moved to last on the <br />agenda. Reverse order of Sobola and Sands agenda items. <br />ill. Public Comment <br />1. Bill Schrenker - resident, spoke recommending that #he commission disband as a result of the <br />November �ote. <br />2. Sharon Gerber — resident, spoke indicating that many residents dicf not vote far the Charter <br />because Ward System and e�en year voting provisions were not included. <br />3. Bell response was #hat these items were discussed by the Commission but not included so as to <br />minimize the changes to the way the city go�ernment functions. <br />4. Georgianne Hall — resident/League of Women Voters -- spoke indicating that the school district <br />would have to change the timing of it's elections if the Charter made changes to the timing of the <br />City elections. <br />5. Dicic Houck — resident, complemented the Charter Commission on its' deliverables. Spoke a) <br />that some comments were made against the Charter that scared people fram adopting it. b) <br />personal attacks snauld not have been part of the Charter debaie c) that the charter is an <br />economic way for communities to affect change. <br />Bell response was that all Commission members were pQlite and courteous at all fimes and thanked <br />past chair Vicki Lorenz <br />IV. Leaque of Minnesota Cities — Lorenz indicated that the Commission recei�ed an invoice from the <br />League of Minnesota Cities for work completed by Quke Addic4cs. Invoice amount was $60a (10 <br />hours @$60 per hour). Motion by Lorenz to approve, Sands second — unanimously approved. <br />V. Sobola Resolution to Dissol�e Commission [see Nov 20, 2001 agenda] — Sobola indicated that she <br />was unsure if ihe Commission could disband or lf it was permanent. See statue 410.05-2. <br />Motion by Bell - Tl�e next meeting of the Cha�ter Commission would be held on the third Wednesday <br />in April 2002 and #he Commission would solicit from i�e new City Council what their wishes are wikh <br />regard to the Charter. Brewer second <br />Discussion — Riach — Not convinced that we are a permanent body and can't disband, would like an <br />opinion on whether the Commission can do so or not. Brewer— We should recognize the majority <br />and continue to refine the documenf. Johnson — Received several calis (9}, mostly pro Charter (7 to <br />2)- <br />Rofl Call Vote — Motian Passed 6 to 3. <br />Motion by Riach — That the Commission request a legal opinion from League of Minnesota Cities on <br />if we can disband, +f not then what shou[d be our future action be. Bell second — unanimously <br />approved. <br />VI. Sancis Motion to Amend B-Laws [see No� 20, 2001 agenda] <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.