Laserfiche WebLink
The final new item was a refrigerator magnet <br />listing the broad categories of what is accepted <br />in Roseville's recycling program and what is <br />not. Focus group participants loved the <br />simplicity of the design and ease of use. They <br />gave their highest marks to the magnet. <br />Residents were also sent a calendar of recycling <br />dates that had been previously distribuied in the <br />January/February resident newsletter. Copies of <br />the education materials can be found in <br />Appendix A. <br />Table 1 <br />Educational Material Used in Pilot <br />How to Recycle More Paper Brochure <br />Where Your Recycling Goes Brochure <br />What Plastics to Recycle Flier <br />Refrigerator Magnet <br />Annual Calendar <br />One of the test areas was given only the increased educational material to see if it would affect residents' <br />recycling beha�iors. <br />Bin/Cart Capacity <br />Data collected by the City plus the results of the RAM and Eureka Recycling studies also zndicate irnproved <br />bi�n capacity is a key component of getting residents to recycle more. <br />Three components of capacity emerged for study: larger bins, wheels for bins and carts, and weekly <br />coilection. <br />Larger Bins <br />Roseville's recycling program has not ke�t up with residents' need for more storage room. Roseville <br />received a gtant from the Metropolitan Council in the eaxly 1990's to pu.rchase bins to distribute to residents. <br />Each household was provided one free 18-gallon recycling bin. Up until late 2001 City staff only gave out <br />one bin per persan even though the recycling program expanded to take more mater�al. <br />While 81 % of residents who recycled surveyed in 2002 said they use the bins, 54% of recyclers said the bins <br />do no� meet their needs. Those residents were then asked what would make the bin better. Sixty-six percent <br />of those res�dents said make ii larger, 61 % said add wheels and 34% said add covers. <br />Wheels for Bins and Carts <br />The Eureka study found the most significant increase zn the amaunt of recyclable material that was <br />successfully collected and processed was in the zone r�vhere residents used two 32-gallon vvheeled carts — one <br />for paper and one for bottles and cans. However, the cost of wheeled carts is #oo expensive for most <br />murucipalities to afford on their own — approximately $35 a cart. A reasonable facsianile could be assembled <br />for a more manageable cost. For instance, the current blue bins cost about $5.50 a bin, lids are another $3.00 <br />a piece and wheel kits run about $5 each. So a pair of wheeled bins with lids could be assembled for $27. <br />Roseville wanted to find out if residents really would be interested in using larger bins with wbeels. City <br />staff conducted focus groups on March 13 and Ma.rch 30, 2004 to ask residents that question. First ttiey were <br />asked to pick their preferred bin size. Twenty-five of ihe 31 participants voted for larger than the current 1 S- <br />gallon bin. Most of them (18) picked the rectangular 24-gallon bin. When asked about addin.g wheels, 20 <br />�'7 <br />