My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005 Recycling Pilot Program Report
Roseville
>
Studies, Task Forces, Special Committees, Reports
>
2005 Recycling Pilot Program Report
>
2005 Recycling Pilot Program Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 12:57:42 PM
Creation date
6/5/2012 3:05:10 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
collected co-mingled. Thus the more sorting done by the home owner, the greater the profit rate on the sale <br />of material. <br />Cities such as Minneapolis that rely on revenue sharing money stay with source separated collection in order <br />to nnaximize their profits. Other cities such as Minnetonka and Plymouth strike a balance between profits <br />and convenience to zesidents by using a two-stream system. Residents have to do less work, but the cities <br />receive a lower profit rate. <br />Where the Money Goes <br />Where the pro�ts go depends on the city. For instance a portion of Minneapolzs' profit sharing is used to <br />offset costs in other portions of the city's budget such as the free drop off of large appliances voucher <br />program. Cities sach as Plymouth use the profits to reduce the direct cost to residents for recycling <br />collectian. <br />Profit sharing may not always be in the form of cash. Under Fridley's ag:reement, the Contractor puis the <br />money into an account. The City uses funds from the account to purchase services from the Cant�'actor such <br />as an appliance drop off day. <br />40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.