My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0129
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0129
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:44:44 AM
Creation date
2/27/2007 3:51:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/29/2007
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Roseville City Council <br />Minutes of 1/29/07 Pg 19 of 38 <br />Councilmember Roe concurred with Councilmember Pust, that any future <br />appointments would be proactive; and that only the reappointment of these <br />two individuals on this particular commission was currently being consid- <br />ered. Councilmember Roe reiterated comments made previously that Coun- <br />cilmember's Kough and Ihlan had moved and voted the current policy; and <br />questioned their lack of support for the policy at this time. Councilmember <br />Roe opined that these were two excellent commissioners being considered <br />for reappointment; and further opined that they were both previously ap- <br />pointed during Councilmember Kough's time in office, so he should have <br />been a participant in their interviews. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan, in response to Councilmember Roe's comments, <br />opined that the previous vote on the policy was irrelevant and was the best <br />policy available under the circumstances. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing spoke in support of the motion; and recognized Planning <br />Commission Chair Bakeman's comments endorsing the reappointment of <br />both Commissioner Boerigter and Doherty; their work to-date and the future <br />workload of the commission and their expertise and skills already devel- <br />oped. <br /> <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Roe; Pust and Klausing. <br />Nays: Kough and Ihlan. <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />11. Consider Appointments to the Planning Commission <br />Considerable discussion was held regarding the process for voting on the <br />appointment process; and the context of Chair Bakeman's endorsements. <br /> <br />Councilmembers Ihlan and Kough registered their opposition to including <br />Chair Bakeman's recommendations as part of the selection process. <br /> <br />Ihlan moved, Kough seconded, to not include Planning Commission Chair's <br />recommendation in the City Council selection process. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pust questioned how the process would be skewed with in- <br />cluding Chair Bakeman's recommendations in the process. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued. <br /> <br />Roll Call <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.