Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Roseville City Council <br />Minutes of 1/29/07 Pg 27 of 38 <br />ciation for the public comments heard on the issue and their concerns; origi- <br />nal concerns and objections expressed by neighbors and the City Council re- <br />garding the private cul-de-sac and lack of emergency and service vehicle ac- <br />cess and operations; and her reliance on the expertise ofthe City Engineer <br />regarding roadway width and right-of-way sufficiency. Councilmember <br />Pust reviewed the various balance issues required; City Council support of <br />mature tree preservation, and lack of current tree preservation policies; the <br />need for the Council to do their work in adopting a tree preservation ordi- <br />nance; and the need for the public to hold the City Council accountable for <br />enforcing conditions on subdivisions. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing briefly interrupted to encourage residents to contact staff <br />with any areas of non-compliance with previously-approved subdivisions for <br />enforcement of applied conditions. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pust concluded by noting that, in Section 7.2 of the staff re- <br />port regarding previous subdivision of the surrounding properties; and noted <br />that some of those opposing the project were living on lots previously subdi- <br />vided; with past and future subdivision a part of the area and the commu- <br />nity's redevelopment and similar benefits applicable to Mr. Mueller as well. <br />Councilmember Pust noted the willingness of Mr. Mueller to work with the <br />neighbors; thanked the public for their comments; and encouraged their sup- <br />port for Mr. Mueller's willingness to take their concerns into consideration <br />in developing and revising the proposed development, taking into considera- <br />tion economic realities and his ownership of the property, and expressed her <br />support of the project if the current motion failed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Roe noted the difficulty in making this decision, and his <br />discussions with neighbors, as well as public comment at the Planning <br />Commission and City Council levels; and the frustration in not being able to <br />please everyone. Councilmember Roe opined that his biggest issue was City <br />acceptance of the cul-de-sac and justification for serving a small number of <br />homes, noting that some concerns could be addressed through conditions, <br />and may prove beneficial to Acorn Road. <br /> <br />Council member Roe opined that he couldn't share the safety objections, as <br />the Acorn Road volumes didn't support major safety issues and noted that <br />there are other areas of the City that have much more dense intersections, <br />and that it didn't meet the thresholds of health and safety concerns as out- <br />