Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, February 12, 2007 <br />Page 25 of 30 <br /> <br />Source Type/End Dates Amount <br />Metropolitan Council Tax Base Revitalization Ac- $692,200 <br /> count / December 31, 2007 <br />Metropolitan Council Tax Base Revitalization Ac- <br /> count / June 30, 2008 $350,000 <br />DEED Contamination Cleanup Pro- $1,300,000 <br /> gram / June 30, 2008 and June <br /> 30,2009 <br /> <br />Ms. Radel reviewed timelines and the scope of the project; specificities and <br />ranking criteria used by agencies for merits of submitted applications. Ms. <br />Radel noted the competitive nature of grants; projected number of new jobs; <br />increased tax base; and number of new market-rate and affordable housing <br />uni ts. <br /> <br />With the demise of the project, Ms. Radel provided four options for Council <br />consideration for the grant monies, and as presented during staffs meeting <br />with the granting agencies: <br />1) Requesting that funds be redirected to a different area of the site where <br />near-term development is anticipated; <br />2) Requesting an extension to the terms of the grants to allow the City to <br />negotiate new development agreements; <br />3) Seeking agency approval to amend the scope of the grant, reducing both <br />the area to be cleaned up and the amount of funding to be paid; and <br />4) Relinquishing the grant awards and submitting a new application during a <br />future funding cycle at such time as the City has firm commitments for <br />redevelopment. <br /> <br />Staff recommended it was in the City's best interest for the City Council to <br />relinquish the grant funds back to the Metropolitan Council and DEED. <br /> <br />Discussion included ongoing property contamination and imminent clean up <br />costs; pledged matching funds from the City through tax increment financ- <br />ing funds and bond securities; goals of the Metropolitan Council and DEED <br />for job creation; lack of a viable project at this time; and the need to retain a <br />good faith relationship with both agencies for future grant application con- <br />siderations. <br />