My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0212
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0212
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:44:57 AM
Creation date
3/5/2007 12:01:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/12/2007
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, February 12, 2007 <br />Page 27 of 30 <br /> <br />her preference for two separate interview dates, preferably prior to a regular <br />Monday meeting date, to reduce overall meeting time. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing focused discussion on whether the City Council wanted to <br />reappoint existing commissioners, as applicable. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pust opined that existing commissioners had provided great <br />service to the City, and while discussion continued about revisiting the exist- <br />ing policy, the current policy indicated a two-tiered approach. <br /> <br />Pust moved, Roe seconded, reappointment of the following comn1issioners: <br />Jeff Johnson, Sarah Brodt Lenz and Harold Ristow to the Parks and Recrea- <br />tion Commission; Mary Jean Turina Anderson to the Police Civil Service <br />Commission; and Joel Fischer to the Public Works, Environment and Trans- <br />portation Commission for terms expiring IvIarch 31, 2010. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan spoke against the motion; proposing the need for im- <br />mediate revision to language of existing policy; and advocated for suspen- <br />sion of the existing policy and consider reappointments with new appoint- <br />ments. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough spoke against the motion, opining that new candi- <br />dates be given equal consideration for appointment to advisory commis- <br />SIons. <br /> <br />Councilmember Roe spoke in support of the motion, and concurred with <br />Councilmember Pust's interpretation of current policy language. Council- <br />member Roe opined that until that policy was changed, the City Council <br />should follow the policy; but observed he was not against revisiting and re- <br />considering the existing policy. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan opined that it would be impossible to change the pol- <br />icy if incumbents continued to be reappointed before considering revising <br />the policy. <br /> <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Roe; Pust and Klausing. <br />Nays: Kough and Ihlan. <br />Motion Carried. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.