|
Other Sources (Uses)
<br />Transfer In (Out)
<br />Other
<br />Total Other Sources (Uses)
<br />Excess of Funding Sources
<br />Over (Under) Funding
<br />Uses
<br />Fund Balance - Jan 1 st
<br />Fund Balance - Dec 31 st
<br />Discussion Items
<br />1,479,393 - 96,100 - -
<br />(4,023) - - - 1,440
<br />1,475,370 - 96,100 - 1,440
<br />1,128,821
<br />(1,138,675)
<br />$ (9,854)
<br />2,760 6208
<br />(9,854) (7,094)
<br />$ (7,094) $ 55,714
<br />55,714
<br />$ 55,714 $
<br />55,714
<br />55,714
<br />From 2004 -2008, the City's Recreation Fund realized a steady increase in revenues at approximately 7%
<br />annually. This was largely due to a significant increase in the portion of the property tax dedicated for
<br />parks and recreation activities. Prior year financials clearly indicated that current service levels could
<br />not be maintained by user charges alone. User charges have increased at approximately 7% per year
<br />keeping pace with inflation and activity levels.
<br />During this same period, operating expenses increased at approximately 4% annually. This reflected a
<br />dedicated effort to find new cost efficiencies and eliminate some smaller programs that were
<br />underutilized.
<br />It is expected that future revenues and expenditures will increase at a commensurate level to account for
<br />activity levels and operating costs. The Recreation Fund had experienced recurring operating deficits
<br />during the late 1990's and early 2000's. Beginning in 2003, the City adopted a more conservative
<br />revenue forecast methodology that has more accurately represented the Fund's financial activities. In
<br />late 2004, citing the revised methodology and economic realities, the City Council agreed to transfer
<br />monies in from other parks and recreation - related funds to erase the accumulated deficit.
<br />22
<br />City of Roseville - 2008 Budget
<br />Recreation Fund
<br />The table below shows a 5 -year comparison
<br />of funding sources,
<br />uses, and
<br />changes in fund balance for
<br />the Recreation Fund.
<br />2004
<br />2005
<br />2006
<br />2007
<br />2008
<br />Funding Sources
<br />Actual
<br />Actual
<br />Actual
<br />Buffet
<br />Buffet
<br />Property Taxes
<br />$ 1,202,815
<br />$ 1,388,625
<br />$ 1,515,555
<br />$ 1,677,450
<br />$ 1,787,335
<br />Charges for Services
<br />1,400,578
<br />1,418,980
<br />1,610,987
<br />1,752,641
<br />1,785,270
<br />Rentals
<br />42,645
<br />51,134
<br />71,329
<br />-
<br />-
<br />Donations
<br />36,706
<br />67,105
<br />27,977
<br />-
<br />-
<br />Interest Earnings
<br />12,477
<br />6,284
<br />19,141
<br />-
<br />-
<br />Other Revenue
<br />66,128
<br />86,117
<br />80,536
<br />6,324
<br />-
<br />Total Sources
<br />2,761,349
<br />3,018,245
<br />3,325,525
<br />3,436,415
<br />3,57205
<br />Funding Uses
<br />Personnel
<br />2,015,126
<br />1,984,166
<br />2,072,255
<br />2,158,155
<br />2,21800
<br />Supplies & Materials
<br />241,974
<br />243,750
<br />249,999
<br />265,050
<br />262,290
<br />Other Services & Charges
<br />821,400
<br />775,132
<br />905,413
<br />1,010,710
<br />1,049,675
<br />Capital Outlay
<br />29,398
<br />12,437
<br />131,150
<br />2,500
<br />4400
<br />Total Uses
<br />3,107,898
<br />3,015,485
<br />3,358,817
<br />3,436,415
<br />3,574,045
<br />Other Sources (Uses)
<br />Transfer In (Out)
<br />Other
<br />Total Other Sources (Uses)
<br />Excess of Funding Sources
<br />Over (Under) Funding
<br />Uses
<br />Fund Balance - Jan 1 st
<br />Fund Balance - Dec 31 st
<br />Discussion Items
<br />1,479,393 - 96,100 - -
<br />(4,023) - - - 1,440
<br />1,475,370 - 96,100 - 1,440
<br />1,128,821
<br />(1,138,675)
<br />$ (9,854)
<br />2,760 6208
<br />(9,854) (7,094)
<br />$ (7,094) $ 55,714
<br />55,714
<br />$ 55,714 $
<br />55,714
<br />55,714
<br />From 2004 -2008, the City's Recreation Fund realized a steady increase in revenues at approximately 7%
<br />annually. This was largely due to a significant increase in the portion of the property tax dedicated for
<br />parks and recreation activities. Prior year financials clearly indicated that current service levels could
<br />not be maintained by user charges alone. User charges have increased at approximately 7% per year
<br />keeping pace with inflation and activity levels.
<br />During this same period, operating expenses increased at approximately 4% annually. This reflected a
<br />dedicated effort to find new cost efficiencies and eliminate some smaller programs that were
<br />underutilized.
<br />It is expected that future revenues and expenditures will increase at a commensurate level to account for
<br />activity levels and operating costs. The Recreation Fund had experienced recurring operating deficits
<br />during the late 1990's and early 2000's. Beginning in 2003, the City adopted a more conservative
<br />revenue forecast methodology that has more accurately represented the Fund's financial activities. In
<br />late 2004, citing the revised methodology and economic realities, the City Council agreed to transfer
<br />monies in from other parks and recreation - related funds to erase the accumulated deficit.
<br />22
<br />
|