My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Bldg Facility Needs Committee Report Aug 2010-Mar 2011
Roseville
>
Studies, Task Forces, Special Committees, Reports
>
Fire Station
>
Bldg Facility Needs Committee Report Aug 2010-Mar 2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 12:13:25 PM
Creation date
6/20/2012 9:57:46 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Fire Station #2 <br />The committee, after an extensive review of the decision matrix items, much discussion, and <br />assistance of the architectural service firm Buetow and Associates Inc., has the following <br />perspertive: <br />The building has many of the same components from when the building was built 44 years ago. <br />While some minor interior renovations were completed over the years, most of the major <br />funrCional camponents are original and in need of repair or repfacement. The roof is leaking <br />and is in need of replacement. The basement has water leaking inta the we5t storage room. <br />The building does not meet most of the major compliance standards. The mechanicaf and <br />electrical systems are dated and at the end of there life cycle. It was built prior to energy <br />requirements, thus has no insulation, leading to higher than average energy cost. Concrete <br />floors are cracked and in need af replacement. Doors and windows are old and in need of <br />replacement. <br />i'he committee felt the building did not meet any of the needed space required for current or <br />future service needs due to the easement, which exists on all four sides of the building. The <br />committee also felt the location was not ideal for current or future service to the community. <br />The consensus was the building was not a candidate for remodel. <br />Fire Station #3 <br />The committee, after an extensive review of the decision matrix items, much discussion, and <br />assistance of the architectural service firm Buetow and Associates Inc., has the following <br />perspective: <br />The building was built as a cailback fire station, with as best we can determine, a projected 25- <br />35 year life expectancy based off the types of construction materials used at the time. The <br />building has now exceeded its projected life cycle and its designed use has many outstanding <br />maintenance issues, including a signi�cant mold condition, causing health issues for working <br />firefighters. The building is in need of roof replacement. It does not meet most of the major <br />compliance standards. The mechanical and electrical systems are dated and at the end of their <br />life cycle. The building was built prior to energy requirements, thus has no insulation, leading <br />to higher than average energy costs. Concrete floors are cracked and in need of replacement. <br />The doors and windows are old and in need of replacement. The generator is the original and <br />in need of replacement. The exterior block was not designed for this constr�ction type. The <br />io <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.