Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,May 21,2012 <br /> Page 28 <br /> At a minimum, Mr. Grefenberg advised that SWARN was asking for the oppor- <br /> tunity, before a Building Permit for this development was issued, notice to for- <br /> mally appeal the administrative decision to issue the permit. From his perspec- <br /> tive, Mr. Grefenberg opined that there had never been a really adequate discus- <br /> sion of Comprehensive Plan policies, a number included in packet materials that <br /> clearly contradicted allowing such a development. Mr. Grefenberg disputed the <br /> assumption provided by staff to the Planning Commission that the proposed de- <br /> velopment meets the Comprehensive Plan or Twin Lakes Master Plan. Mr. <br /> Grefenberg opined that if the City Council allowed this signature piece to be a <br /> Wal-Mart or Target store, it should not expect much quality residential or retail <br /> development to follow in the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area. Mr. Grefen- <br /> berg referenced the Implementation Section of the Comprehensive Plan, ad- <br /> dressing patience as the City moved toward its future goals, and willingly pro- <br /> moted public and private development that fit that vision, dissuading those that <br /> did not. If the City Council proceeds with Plat approval, Mr. Grefenberg asked <br /> that it direct staff to notify residents with adequate time to appeal the adminis- <br /> trative decision for issuance of the Building Permit once the developer's plans <br /> were submitted. Mr. Grefenberg opined that Roseville citizens, to-date, had not <br /> gotten a fair hearing of this issue. <br /> Megan Dushin (SWARN) <br /> Ms. Dushin referenced numerous quotes from Chapter 4 (page 423) of the <br /> Comprehensive Plan; and sought clarification if the Twin Lakes Master Plan <br /> was included or not included in the Comprehensive Plan, since she had heard <br /> two (2) different versions, based on her research of a September 12, 2011 staff <br /> report, and page 423 of the Comprehensive Plan, and page 9, Section 2, and <br /> page 11 of the Twin Lakes Master Plan and comments about big box retail and <br /> incorporation of the 2011 Twin Lakes Master Plan guiding future development. <br /> Ms. Dushin further referenced surface parking restrictions addressed in Section <br /> 14 of the Land Use Section (page 20) of the Twin Lakes Master Plan. <br /> In conclusion, Ms Dushin questioned the policy for expanding retail in the area, <br /> and whether this development would provide head of household job opportuni- <br /> ties stipulated by the City's Comprehensive Plan. <br /> Gary Grefenberg(SWARN) <br /> Mr. Grefenberg specifically addressed traffic analyses, referencing the MnDOT <br /> letter dated May 9, 2012 to staff; opining that Wal-Mart's expense to the City <br /> over the next decade would far exceed Wal-Mart's payment of$400,000 for in- <br /> frastructure improvements. In the meantime, Mr. Grefenberg opined that Rose- <br /> ville residents would suffer the penalties while private profits would go to Ar- <br /> kansas. <br /> Mr. Grefenberg asked Councilmembers why they were rushing to approve the <br /> Preliminary and Final Plats, when there were so many unanswered questions yet <br />