My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_0521
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_0521
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2012 1:32:51 PM
Creation date
6/20/2012 12:12:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/21/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, May 21,2012 <br /> Page 35 <br /> than 100,000 trips daily. Ms. Bloom summarized that the increased traffic pro- <br /> jected for the future was 6,000 vehicles per hour for northbound I-35W some <br /> portion of which may utilize the interchange, but clarified that they would not <br /> all be accessing the Wal-Mart development specifically. <br /> Ms. Bloom displayed a map showing the Twin Lakes Parkway interchange, and <br /> proposed interchange improvements to address cuing concerns of MnDOT and <br /> S.R.F. Consulting, both included as attachments to the staff reports as back- <br /> ground material, and potential stacking concerns impacting I-35W, creating the <br /> required improvement shown in the Development Agreement. <br /> Regarding the City requirement to make sure access was made available to the <br /> Wal-Mart site, Ms. Bloom and Mr. Trudgeon were in agreement that they didn't <br /> foresee a delay in providing permanent access, without the need to provide a <br /> temporary means. However, Ms. Bloom advised that the City would be obligat- <br /> ed to provide access, whether temporary or permanent in accordance with the <br /> terms of the Development Agreement. At the request of Mayor Roe regarding <br /> public comment on who would pay for the rest of the cost of the I-35W im- <br /> provements, Ms. Bloom advised that, while that remains to be determined, grant <br /> funds and Chapter 429 assessments to benefitting property owners were both <br /> options. Ms. Bloom noted that the City's request for grant funds had been <br /> scored very favorably, but was still not awarded, and expressed cautious opti- <br /> mism that funding would be made available,but not yet in place. <br /> Current level of retail in Roseville and Potential Impacts for Wal-Mart <br /> At the invitation of Mayor Roe, Ms. Steinwall responded that, while she was not <br /> privy to Wal-Mart's business plan, market research had found that Roseville cit- <br /> izens were shopping at Wal-Mart. Ms. Steinwall noted that her client was obvi- <br /> ously confident that there were unfilled retail needs in the community, and they <br /> recognized Roseville as a terrific community and were excited to become part <br /> of that community. Ms. Steinwall advised that trends supported the fact that <br /> the more retail available in an area, the better the market was for everyone; and <br /> advised there was no concern by Wal-Mart with existing retail in Roseville. <br /> Spacing of Stores/Potential Closures <br /> At the invitation of Mayor Roe, Ms. Steinwall responded that, while again not <br /> privy to her client's business and/or future plans, in observing other big box re- <br /> tailer space throughout the Twin Cities area (e.g. Target), there were similarities <br /> for locating close to other stores. Whether one store may close due to another <br /> store being built in Roseville, Ms. Steinwall noted that she was unable to predict <br /> the future; however, she anticipated that a vast majority of customers will visit <br /> this Wal-Mart from within a two (2)mile radius. <br /> Roseville Design Standards/Development Process <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.