My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_0611
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_0611
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2012 12:34:10 PM
Creation date
6/20/2012 12:33:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/11/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 11,2012 <br /> Page 20 <br /> Mr. Schwartz reviewed typical scenarios and when the City was notified; advis- <br /> ing that the City would know where and when a backup occurred and where that <br /> backup was specifically located. Mr. Schwartz clarified one past circumstance <br /> when the backup was attributed to a failure in the Metropolitan Council's Trunk <br /> line that routes through Roseville, and the City being alerted immediately that <br /> the City's system could not discharge appropriately due to the failure of the Met <br /> Council's line. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, referencing another back-up situa- <br /> tion, Ms. Davitt clarified that it was immediately apparent of a failure in the <br /> City's line, but that the failure was caused by rags and treeroots, even though <br /> the City had regularly maintained the line, and technically the City was not lia- <br /> ble for the homeowner's costs. However, Mr. Schwartz advised that the City <br /> crew was called in and cleared the blockage from that line, even though the City <br /> was not liable for the backup. <br /> As further discussion ensued, Mr. Schwartz clarified that the proposed policy <br /> did not consider fault in its provisions. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, City Attorney Mark Gaughan ad- <br /> vised that, as discussed at a previous meeting, in making the policy effective <br /> upon its adoption and not pre-dating it to address previous occurrences, the City <br /> Council was able to ensure a particular process was in place under this policy <br /> and manage who was performing cleanup work; however, they could not neces- <br /> sarily do so from those past events since this process was not followed. City <br /> Attorney Gaughan cautioned that if previous events were considered, it could <br /> set the City up having a policy in place and immediate issues about it not com- <br /> plying and not setting up a good practice. <br /> Councilmember McGehee spoke in support of this version of the policy; and re- <br /> lated to Councilmember Pust's concerns about clarification, opined that the City <br /> Council should direct staff to mail a copy of the policy and explanation and de- <br /> scription of backflow preventers and homeowner responsibilities to all residen- <br /> tial properties in Roseville. Councilmember McGehee opined that this explana- <br /> tion should include a demonstration of where private and city lines began and <br /> ended; and make that available as a full package to avoid misunderstandings in <br /> the future. Councilmember McGehee also opined that insurance options and <br /> provisions for homeowners should also be made available for people to check <br /> with their insurance carriers. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that previous discussions had included the education program <br /> that went along with this policy. <br /> Councilmember Wilimus, recognizing the City Attorney's concerns regarding <br /> reviewing past cases and excluding them from this policy, opined that the City <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.