My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0226
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0226
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:45:10 AM
Creation date
3/16/2007 9:16:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/26/2007
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />Minutes of <br />Monday, February 26, 2007 <br />Page 10 <br /> <br />Joe Samuel, Site Engineer with Kimco, and Consultant with Starbucks was <br />present. Mr. Samuel apologized for the applicant not being present, due to <br />weather-related issues, as they were stranded in Ohio. <br /> <br />Mr. Samuel provided additional aerial presentations and site plans indicating <br />traffic flow on site; truck deliveries off County Road B; shared access with <br />the daycare to Fairview; other ingress/egress points; stormwater manage- <br />ment with an underground system; and timing of deliveries in late evening <br />or very early morning, that would not conflict with the daycare traffic. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing called for public comment at this time. <br /> <br />Public Comment <br />Gladys Reiling, 1877 Gluek Lane, across street from proposed construc- <br />tion <br />Ms. Reiling, identifying herself as the author of the written letter of opposi- <br />tion previously noted, opined that this proposal was not compatible with sur- <br />rounding properties; and negatively impacted their health and property, with <br />constant emissions of car exhaust while vehicles were waiting in line for <br />coffee. Ms. Reiling also addressed negative impacts of increased traffic at <br />this intersection with no barrier to provide added protection. <br /> <br />Arvid Knudtson, 1854 Gluek Lane <br />Mr. Knudtson concurred with Ms. Reiling; and expressed confusion and <br />frustration with the mailed notice provided by the City to area residents; <br />opining that the information and the map was misleading. <br /> <br />Mr. Stark provided an overhead view of the actual post card mailing and the <br />information provided. <br /> <br />Ms. Reiling spoke again, noting that when the post card notice was received, <br />the neighbors thought the property in question was on the north side of <br />Highway 36, where the existing Starbucks was located. <br /> <br />Brad Peper, 1835 Gluek Lane <br />Mr. Peper questioned how many trees would remain in the natural area along <br />Fairview; anticipating increased headlight pollution directed at his house <br />without adequate screening. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.