Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, March 12,2007 <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />6. Consider Items Removed from the Consent Agenda. <br />a. Approve Check Register (Former Consent Item 5.a) <br />Councilmember Ihlan questioned whether several items included on the <br />regular Check Register to Krass Monroe related to Twin Lakes condemna- <br />tions were reimbursable expenses and should have been included in other <br />Twin Lakes-related expenditures for approval. <br /> <br />Finance Director Chris Miller apologized for the confusion; noting that the <br />items and been coded incOlTectly, and yes, should have been included with <br />other reimbursable expenses for Twin Lakes. <br /> <br />Those two items in the amount of $472.50 and $11 ,043.50 respectively, <br />were removed and included with other Twin Lakes expenses under Item 6.a. <br /> <br />Ihlan moved, Pust seconded, approval of the following claims and payments <br />as presented. <br /> <br />ACH Payments $&2<:,131<:.& 1 <br />46640-46828 387,430.54 <br />Total $1,11 :,QSD.3fi <br /> <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Pust; Roe and Klausing. <br />Nays: Ihlan. <br /> <br />b. Approve a 60-Day Extension for the Request by Art Mueller, for a <br />Preliminary Plat to Create Four Lots and a Cul-de-Sac at 2201 Acorn <br />Road (PF 3791) (Former Consent Item 5.h) <br />Councilmember Ihlan questioned why staff was recommending an extension <br />to the application, beyond that requested by the applicant. <br /> <br />City Planner Thomas Paschke advised that it was not uncommon and quite <br />normal for Community Development staff to recommend an extension from <br />preliminary to final plan submission; and noted that the applicant had noted <br />in their request dated February 21, 2007 (Hakanson, Anderson Associates, <br />Inc.) that while the project was in design phase, there may be some delay in <br />soil borings and drainage easements. <br />